...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Biological design in science classrooms
【24h】

Biological design in science classrooms

机译：科学教室的生物设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although evolutionary biology is replete with explanations for complex biological structures, scientists concerned about evolution education have been forced to confront "intelligent design" (ID), which rejects a natural origin for biological complexity. The content of ID is a subset of the claims made by the older "creation science" movement. Both creationist views contend that highly complex biological adaptations and even organisms categorically cannot result from natural causes but require a supernatural creative agent. Historically, ID arose from efforts to produce a form of creationism that would be less vulnerable to legal challenges and that would not overtly rely upon biblical literalism. Scientists do not use ID to explain nature, but because it has support from outside the scientific community, ID is nonetheless contributing substantially to a long-standing assault on the integrity of science education.
机译：尽管进化生物学中充满了对复杂生物结构的解释，但关注进化教育的科学家却被迫面对“智能设计”（ID），该设计拒绝自然而然的生物复杂性。 ID的内容是较早的“创意科学”运动提出的主张的子集。两种创造论者的观点都认为，高度复杂的生物适应乃至有机体绝对不是自然原因造成的，而是需要超自然的创造力。从历史上看，ID源于产生一种形式的创造论的努力，这种形式的创世论不太容易受到法律的挑战，并且不会过分依赖圣经的文字主义。科学家们并不使用ID来解释自然，但由于ID得到科学界外部的支持，ID仍在长期以来对科学教育的完整性发起了重大贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号