首页> 外文期刊>Professional safety >From Good to Great in Safety
【24h】

From Good to Great in Safety

机译:从安全到优秀

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently, the CEO of a leading chemical company told the author he dislikes the term "world-class safety" because its meaning is so ambiguous. "Everyone talks about wanting a world-class safety program, but nobody provides a straightforward definition of this vision. What does it mean to be world class?" This article attempts to answer that provocative question by critically analyzing conclusions reported in Jim Collins's national best-seller Good to Great. Collins and his research team studied 11 companies that progressed from being good to being great, generating cumulative stock returns that averaged 7 times higher than the general stock market. These 11 "great" companies sustained this level of excellence for at least 15 years. Collins does not mention safety in his evaluation of good versus great companies, although the link between profit and safety performance is obvious.
机译:最近,一家领先的化工公司的首席执行官告诉作者,他不喜欢“世界一流的安全性”一词,因为它的含义如此含糊。 “每个人都在谈论要世界一流的安全计划,但是没有人提供对这一愿景的直接定义。成为世界一流意味着什么?”本文试图通过批判性地分析吉姆·柯林斯(Jim Collins)全国畅销书《 Good to Great》中报告的结论来回答这个挑衅性问题。柯林斯和他的研究小组研究了11家公司,这些公司从优秀成长为优秀,产生的累积股票回报率平均是普通股票市场的7倍。这11家“杰出”公司至少保持了15年的卓越水平。尽管利润和安全绩效之间的联系很明显,但柯林斯在评估优秀与优秀公司时并未提及安全性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Professional safety》 |2006年第6期|p.35-40|共6页
  • 作者

    E. Scott Geller;

  • 作者单位

    Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University in Blacksburg;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 安全科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号