首页> 外文期刊>Reading Psychology >Reading Achievement and Science Proficiency: International Comparisons From the Programme on International Student Assessment
【24h】

Reading Achievement and Science Proficiency: International Comparisons From the Programme on International Student Assessment

机译:阅读成绩和科学水平:国际学生评估计划的国际比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Students need to develop scientific literacy in order to participate fully as citizens, community members, and in the globalized economy. But what is the relationship between scientific literacy and reading literacy? Three international data sets from the Programme on International Student Assessment (PISA) were used to calculate correlations between scientific literacy and reading literacy for 15-year-old students. Mean correlations at the individual student level across countries were .840 for the PISA 2000 data set, .805 for the PISA 2003 data set, and .819 for the PISA 2006 data set. In all three data sets, this correlation varied among countries, and the reading-science relationship was weakest in countries with low country mean reading scores. Three possible interpretations are discussed, favoring the interpretation that knowledge and skills that drive higher reading comprehension also drive higher science achievement.
机译:学生需要发展科学素养,以便以公民,社区成员的身份充分参与全球化经济。但是科学素养和阅读素养之间是什么关系?来自国际学生评估计划(PISA)的三个国际数据集用于计算15岁学生的科学素养与阅读素养之间的相关性。对于PISA 2000数据集,各个国家/地区学生的平均相关度为.840,对于PISA 2003数据集为.805,对于PISA 2006数据集为.819。在所有这三个数据集中,各国之间的相关性各不相同,在国家平均阅读分数较低的国家中,阅读科学关系最弱。讨论了三种可能的解释,赞成这样的解释:驱动更高阅读理解的知识和技能也可以驱动更高的科学成就。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Reading Psychology》 |2009年第2期|89-118|共30页
  • 作者

    Jennifer G. Cromley;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号