...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >When birds of a feather don't flock together: Different scientists and the roles they play in biotech R&D alliances
【24h】

When birds of a feather don't flock together: Different scientists and the roles they play in biotech R&D alliances

机译：当羽毛鸟不能聚集在一起时：不同的科学家及其在生物技术研发联盟中扮演的角色

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A firm's ability to produce high-impact innovations depends upon the nature of its R&D alliances as well as its composition of scientific human capital. The firm's scientific human capital is made up of its scientists, who produce valuable research outputs and who engage with the broader scientific community, thus helping the firm to integrate new knowledge from universities and other firms. In this paper, we examine heterogeneity within the firm's scientific human capital, emphasizing the distinct role of'bridging scientists' who engage in two related but dissimilar scientific activities: patenting and publishing. Using a panel dataset of 222 firms in biotechnology between 1990 and 2000, we show that bridging scientists have a positive and significant impact on patent performance relative to other scientists within the firm. Looking closer at bridging scientists, we draw a distinction between Pasteur bridging scientists and Edison bridging scientists, with the latter having less of an orientation towards fundamental research. We show that both types of bridging scientists complement the focal firm's R&D alliances with other firms. However, Pasteur bridging scientists are substitutive with university R&D alliances while Edison bridging scientists are complementary. Our findings suggest that the composition of a firm's scientific human capital and its R&D alliances interact in subtle ways to impact patent performance.
机译：公司产生高影响力创新的能力取决于其研发联盟的性质及其科学人力资本的组成。公司的科学人力资本由科学家组成，这些科学家产生有价值的研究成果并与更广泛的科学界互动，从而帮助公司整合来自大学和其他公司的新知识。在本文中，我们考察了公司科学人力资本中的异质性，强调了“桥接科学家”的独特作用，他们参与了两个相关但又不同的科学活动：专利和出版。使用1990年至2000年期间222家生物技术公司的面板数据集，我们显示，与公司中的其他科学家相比，桥接科学家对专利绩效具有积极而显着的影响。在衔接科学家方面，我们将巴斯德的衔接科学家与爱迪生的衔接科学家区分开来，后者对基础研究的关注较少。我们证明，两种类型的桥梁科学家都是对焦点公司与其他公司的研发联盟的补充。但是，巴斯德的桥梁科学家是大学研发联盟的替代者，而爱迪生的桥梁科学家是互补的。我们的发现表明，一家公司的科学人力资本及其研发联盟的构成以微妙的方式相互作用，从而影响专利绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号