• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Give Me an Experiment and I Will Raise a Laboratory
【24h】

Give Me an Experiment and I Will Raise a Laboratory

机译：给我一个实验，我将建立一个实验室

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Bruno Latour once argued that science laboratories actively modify the wider society by displacing crucial actors outside the laboratory into the "field." This article turns this idea on its head by using the case of geo-thermal energy utilization to demonstrate that in many cases it is the experimental setup outside the laboratory that is there first, with the activities normally associated with a laboratory setting only being decided upon and implemented post hoc. As soon as the actors involved perceive unknowns and uncertainties, these are relocated to various kinds of closed laboratories to be dealt with in a more controlled environment. This is done, for instance, by inviting stakeholders to laboratory-like settings or by analyzing the geochemical composition of fluids in laboratories. Thus, the risk-laden production of new knowledge by means of real-world experimentation amounts to a practice of relocating the context of discovery in society to laboratories of justification sometimes defined as such post hoc. Experimental processes in society can then be conceptualized as "real" experiments and laboratory activities as merely temporarily subordinated components of the larger experiment.
机译：布鲁诺·拉图尔（Bruno Latour）曾经辩称，科学实验室通过将实验室以外的重要角色转移到“领域”中来积极地改变整个社会。本文通过利用地热能的案例来反驳这一想法，以证明在许多情况下，首先是实验室之外的实验装置，通常仅与实验室环境相关的活动才能确定并事后实施。一旦涉及的参与者意识到了未知和不确定性，就会将它们转移到各种封闭的实验室中，以在更可控的环境中进行处理。例如，这可以通过邀请利益相关者参加类似于实验室的设置或通过分析实验室流体的地球化学成分来完成。因此，通过现实世界的实验来产生大量新知识的风险等于将社会发现环境重新定位到有时被称为事后证明的实验室的做法。然后，可以将社会中的实验过程概念化为“真实”实验和实验室活动，而只是较大实验的临时从属组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号