• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in history and philosophy of science >A place for pragmatism in the dynamics of reason?
【24h】

A place for pragmatism in the dynamics of reason?

机译：理性动力中实用主义的地方？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In Dynamics of Reason Michael Friedman proposes a kind of synthesis between the neokantianism of Ernst Cassirer, the logical empiricism of Rudolf Carnap, and the historicism of Thomas Kuhn. Cassirer and Car-nap are to take care of the Kantian legacy of modern philosophy of science, encapsulated in the concept of the relativized a priori and the globally rational or continuous evolution of scientific knowledge, while Kuhn's role is to ensure that the historicist character of scientific knowledge is taken seriously. More precisely, Carnapian linguistic frameworks, guarantee that the evolution of science proceeds in a rational manner locally, while Cassirer's concept of an internally defined conceptual convergence of empirical theories provides the means to maintain the global continuity of scientific reason. In this paper it is argued that Friedman's Neokantian account of scientific reason based on the concept of the relativized a priori underestimates the pragmatic aspects of the dynamics of scientific reason. To overcome this shortcoming, I propose to reconsider C.I. Lewis's account of a pragmatic priori, recently modernized and elaborated by Hasok Chang. This may be considered as a first step to a dynamics of an embodied reason, less theoretical and more concrete than Friedman's Neokantian proposal.
机译：迈克尔·弗里德曼（Michael Friedman）在《理性动力》中提出了恩斯特·卡西尔（Ernst Cassirer）的新康德主义，鲁道夫·卡尔纳普（Rudolf Carnap）的逻辑经验主义与托马斯·库恩（Thomas Kuhn）的历史主义之间的一种综合。卡西尔（Carsirer）和卡纳普（Car-nap）将照顾现代科学哲学的康德遗迹，将其封装在相对论的先验概念和全球科学知识的合理或持续发展中，而库恩的作用是确保科学知识受到重视。更确切地说，卡尔纳普的语言框架保证科学的发展在局部以理性的方式进行，而卡西尔的经验理论内部定义的概念融合的概念为维持科学理性的全球连续性提供了手段。本文认为，弗里德曼基于相对论先验概念的科学理性的新康德式的解释低估了科学理性动力学的实用性。为了克服这个缺点，我建议重新考虑C.I.刘易斯对务实先验的描述，由Hasok Chang进行了现代化和详细阐述。与弗里德曼（Friedman）的新康德式提议相比，这可以被认为是实现具有内在原因的动力学的第一步，其理论上更少，更具体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号