• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Systems research and behavioral science >Institutional Economics, Social Dilemmas, and the Complexity-Sustainability Trade-off (A response to Hielscher and Pies)
【24h】

Institutional Economics, Social Dilemmas, and the Complexity-Sustainability Trade-off (A response to Hielscher and Pies)

机译：制度经济学，社会困境和复杂性-可持续性的权衡（对Hielscher and Pies的回应）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Drawing inspiration from Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory, the present note argues that the complexity of social systems has the potential to undermine their sustainability and thus to generate social dilemmas. The conceptual construct of the 'complexity-sustainability trade-off' is invoked to make the point that ensuring sustainability, if at all possible, requires controlling the proliferation of systemic complexity. To some extent, this control is feasible through structural couplings that correspond to the economic concept of the internalization of externalities. If this solution falls short of meeting the sustainability goals, systemic complexity can be alternatively controlled through the dampening of systemic imperatives, which translates, at the individual level, into the weakening of incentives. Williamson's transaction cost theory of for-profit hierarchy and Hansmann's trustworthiness theory of nonprofit organizations present cases in point. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译：本说明从尼古拉斯·卢曼的社会系统理论中汲取了灵感，认为社会系统的复杂性有可能破坏其可持续性，从而产生社会困境。援引“复杂性与可持续性之间的权衡”的概念构造以指出确保可持续性（如果有可能）需要控制系统复杂性的扩散。在某种程度上，这种控制通过与外部性内部化的经济概念相对应的结构耦合是可行的。如果该解决方案不能满足可持续性目标，则可以通过抑制系统性需求来控制系统的复杂性，这在个人层面上会导致激励机制的减弱。威廉姆森（Williamson）的营利性层级交易成本理论和汉斯曼（Hansmann）的非营利组织诚信度理论就是例证。版权所有（C）2016 John Wiley＆Sons，Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号