A critique of current practice: ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographers.

Tolich M

首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >A critique of current practice: ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographers.

【24h】

A critique of current practice: ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographers.

机译：对当前实践的批判：针对民族志学家的十项基本准则。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Any research is potentially compromised when researchers address ethical issues retrospectively rather than by anticipating these issues. In this regard, creative analytical practices (CAP) autoethnography has endemic problems. In Part 1 of this article, I detail a case study of an autoethnography in which journal reviewers insisted that an author gain retrospective informed consent from the 23 persons documented in an autoethnography. Yet the journal reviewers' insistence failed to go one step further-acknowledging that a conflict of interest develops when gaining consent retrospectively. In Part 2, I contrast three leading autoethnographers' justifications for not gaining informed consent with the Position Statement on Qualitative Research developed by successive Congresses of Qualitative Inquiry. In Part 3, I identify resources available for autoethnographers, including ethical issues present when researchers use autoethnography to heal themselves, violating the internal confidentiality of relational others. In Part 4, I question if autoethnography is research and, like journalism, exempt from formal ethics review. Throughout the article, 10 foundational ethical considerations for autoethnographers are developed, taking autoethnographers beyond procedural ethics and providing tools for their ethics in practice.

机译：当研究人员回顾性地解决伦理问题而不是通过预见这些问题时，任何研究都可能会受到损害。在这方面，创造性分析实践（CAP）自传民族志存在地方性问题。在本文的第1部分中，我详细介绍了一个民族志学的案例研究，其中期刊审稿人坚持认为作者从民族志学中记录的23个人中获得了追溯知情同意。然而，期刊审稿人的坚持没有进一步走到一步，即承认追溯获得同意时会产生利益冲突。在第2部分中，我对比了三位主要的民族志专家未获得知情同意的理由与历届质量调查代表大会制定的《质量研究立场声明》。在第3部分中，我确定了可供民族志学家使用的资源，包括研究人员使用民族志学自我修复（违反关系他人的内部保密性）时出现的伦理问题。在第4部分中，我质疑民族志学是否属于研究性质，是否像新闻学一样不受正式伦理学审查的约束。在整篇文章中，为民族志专家提供了10个基本的伦理考虑，使民族志专家超越了程序伦理，并在实践中为其伦理提供了工具。

著录项

来源
《Qualitative health research》 |2010年第12期|共12页
作者
Tolich M;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A critique of current practice: ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographers. [J] . Tolich M Qualitative health research . 2010,第12期

机译：对当前实践的批判：针对民族志学家的十项基本准则。
2. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. [J] . Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC J Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association . 2009,第22期

机译：2009年重点更新：STC升高性心肌梗死患者的ACC / AHA管理指南（更新了2004年指南和2007年重点更新）和ACC / AHA / SCAI经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南（更新了2005年指南和2007年重点更新）：美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告。
3. Middle-East OBGYN Graduate Education (MOGGE) Foundation Practice Guidelines: Prelabor rupture of membranes; Practice guideline No. 01-O-19 [J] . Sherif A Shazly, Islam A Ahmed, Ahmad A Radwan, Journal of Global Health . 2020,第1期

机译：中东obgyn研究生教育（Mogge）基础实践指南：膜膜破裂;练习指南01-O-19
4. Outcomes-based assessment in engineering education: A critique of its foundations and practice [C] . Woolston Donald C. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference . 2008

机译：基于结果的工程教育评估：基础和实践的批判
5. Practice and fit in the allocation of the resource of faculty time: A study of current and preferred scholarly practice of the faculties of ten theological schools affiliated with the Presbyterian Church (USA) [D] . Nicholson, Roger Allen. 1997

机译：实践和适应教师时间资源的分配：对与长老会相关的十所神学院的当前和首选学术实践的研究（美国）
6. Middle-East OBGYN Graduate Education (MOGGE) Foundation Practice Guidelines: Prelabor rupture of membranes; Practice guideline No. 01-O-19 [O] . Sherif A Shazly, Islam A Ahmed, Ahmad A Radwan, 2020

机译：中东OBGYN研究生教育（MOGGE）基础实践指南：胎膜早破；实务指引01-O-19
7. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to update the 1997 exercise testing guidelines) 11The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.22This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in July 2002 and by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in June 2002. When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, Mark DB, McCallister BD, Mooss AN, O’Reilly MG, Winters WL Jr. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40.33Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). A single copy of the complete guidelines is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. Ask for reprint No. 71-0231. To obtain a copy of the Executive Summary published in the October 1, 2002 issue of Circulation, ask for reprint No. 71-0232. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4426, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kbradle@lww.com.44(J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40.)55©2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Gibbons Raymond J, Balady Gary J, Timothy Bricker J, 2002

机译：ACC / AHA 2002年运动测试指南更新：摘要文章美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（委员会对1997年运动测试指南进行了更新）11ACC / AHA实践指南工作组使每一个努力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组进行审查，在第一次会议上向书面小组的所有成员口头报告，并在发生变化时进行更新。22本文件于2002年7月获得美国心脏病学会基金会理事会的批准。美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会于2002年6月提出。引用该文件时，美国心脏病学会基金会和美国心脏协会将赞赏以下引用格式：Gibbons RJ，Balady GJ，Bricker JT，Chaitman BR，Fletcher GF， Froelicher VF，Mark DB，McCalister BD，Mooss AN，O'Reilly MG，Winters WL Jr.ACC / AHA 2002锻炼测试指南更新：摘要文章：ACC / AHA实践指南工作组的报告（更新委员会）（1997年运动测试指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2002； 40：1531–40.33副本：该文档可在ACC（www.acc.org）和AHA（www.americanheart.org）的万维网站点上找到。可以通过致电800-253-4636（仅限美国）或写信给美国心脏病学会资源中心（位于贝塞斯达，乔治市老街9111号，马里兰州20814-1699）来获得完整指南的单个副本。要求转载第71-0231号。要获得发表在2002年10月1日的《发行》上的《执行摘要》，请索阅第71-0232号。要购买其他重印本（指定版本和重印本号码）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；否则，请重新发送。 1000份或更多，请致电410-528-4426，传真410-528-4264或电子邮件kbradle@lww.com.44（美国运筹学杂志，2002； 40：1531–40。）55©2002心脏病学基金会基金会和美国心脏协会有限公司

A critique of current practice: ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographers.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅