...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation >Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35.
【24h】

Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35.

机译：鼻咽癌患者的生活质量：对台湾中文版EORTC QLQ-C30和EORTC QLQ-H＆N35的验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The authors followed the guidelines of translation and pilot testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. The questionnaires were given to 50 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients under active treatment and 50 under follow-up at our institution from November 2000 to June 2001. A retest was conducted 2 weeks after the first interview/form completion for the follow-up group. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the two questionnaires were moderate to high in the follow-up group. Cronbach's alpha coefficients of all scales of the two questionnaires were > or = 0.70 except that of cognitive functioning. Correlation of scales measuring similar dimensions of the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to high, while that of the QLQ-H&N35 and the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to low. Patients in the active treatment group had more serious acute problems due to disease and chemotherapy. Patients in the follow-up group had more serious chronic problems due to radiation therapy. We concluded that the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 had moderate to high test-retest reliability, high internal consistency in most scales, and could show the expected differences between patients in active treatment and follow-up group.
机译：作者遵循了EORTC QLQ-C30和EORTC-QLQ-H＆N35问卷的翻译和中试测试的指南。该问卷于2000年11月至2001年6月在我院接受了50例接受积极治疗的鼻咽癌患者的随访，并对50例进行了随访。对随访组的第一次访谈/表格填写后2周进行了重新测试。在随访组中，两份问卷的组内相关系数为中到高。除认知功能外，两份问卷的所有量表的Cronbachα系数均>或= 0.70。 QLQ-C30和SF-36的相似尺寸的量表的相关性为中到高，而QLQ-H＆N35和QLQ-C30和SF-36的相似尺寸为中到低。积极治疗组的患者由于疾病和化疗而出现了更为严重的急性问题。随访组的患者由于放射疗法而出现更严重的慢性问题。我们得出的结论是，台湾中文版本的EORTC QLQ-C30和EORTC QLQ-H＆N35在大多数范围内具有中等到较高的重测信度，高内部一致性，并且可以显示积极治疗和随访患者之间的预期差异组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号