CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY OF ORAL READING FLUENCY AND MAZE IN PREDICTING PERFORMANCE ON LARGE-SCALE READING ASSESSMENTS

DAWN M. DECKER; MICHAEL D. HIXSON; AMBER SHAW; GLORIA JOHNSON

首页> 外文期刊>Psychology in the schools >CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY OF ORAL READING FLUENCY AND MAZE IN PREDICTING PERFORMANCE ON LARGE-SCALE READING ASSESSMENTS

【24h】

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY OF ORAL READING FLUENCY AND MAZE IN PREDICTING PERFORMANCE ON LARGE-SCALE READING ASSESSMENTS

机译：大型阅读评估中的口头阅读能力和迷宫分类精度

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine whether using a multiple-measure framework yielded better classification accuracy than oral reading fluency (ORF) or maze alone in predicting pass/fail rates formiddle-school students on a large-scale reading assessment. Participants were 178 students in Grades 7 and 8 from a Midwestern school district. The multiple-measure framework yielded classification accuracy rates that were either similar to, or better than, the individual predictors. Specificity was improved using a combined measure of ORF and maze versus individual predictors alone. Educational implications for identifying students in need of reading intervention are discussed.

机译：这项研究的目的是检验在大规模阅读评估中预测中学生的及格/不及格率时，使用多指标框架是否比口头阅读流畅度（ORF）或单独使用迷宫效果更好。参与者来自中西部学区的178名7年级和8年级学生。多重测量框架产生的分类准确率与单个预测变量相似或更高。与单独的预测变量相比，使用ORF和迷宫的组合度量可以提高特异性。讨论了对识别需要阅读干预的学生的教育意义。

著录项

来源
《Psychology in the schools》 |2014年第6期|共11页
作者
DAWN M. DECKER; MICHAEL D. HIXSON; AMBER SHAW; GLORIA JOHNSON;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类教育心理学;
关键词
better; implications; similar;

机译：更好;暗示;相似;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY OF ORAL READING FLUENCY AND MAZE IN PREDICTING PERFORMANCE ON LARGE-SCALE READING ASSESSMENTS [J] . DAWN M. DECKER, MICHAEL D. HIXSON, AMBER SHAW, Psychology in the schools . 2014,第6期

机译：大型阅读评估中的口头阅读能力和迷宫分类精度
2. LONGITUDINAL PREDICTION OF 1ST AND 2ND GRADE ENGLISH ORAL READING FLUENCY IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS: WHICH EARLY READING AND LANGUAGE SKILLS ARE BETTER PREDICTORS? [J] . EMILY J. SOLARI, TERESE C. ACEVES, IGNACIO HIGAREDA, Psychology in the schools . 2014,第2期

机译：在英语学习者中对英语一级和二级英语口语阅读能力的纵向预测：哪种早期阅读和英语技能是更好的预测者？
3. The Effectiveness of DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency for Predicting Reading Comprehension of High- and Low-Income Students [J] . Timon M. Paleologosa amp, Edna G. Brabhamb Reading Psychology . 2011,第1期

机译：DIBELS口头阅读流利度对高收入和低收入学生阅读理解能力的预测
4. Predicting Multidimensional Subjective Ratings of Children' Readings from the Speech Signals for the Automatic Assessment of Fluency [C] . Gerard Bailly, Erika Godde, Anne-Laure Piat-Marchand, International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation . 2020

机译：从语音信号预测儿童读数的多维主观评级，自动评估流利
5. Need for speed: The relationship between oral reading fluency and the Minnesota Comprehensive Reading Assessment. [D] . Fuchs, Jennifer Lynn. 2007

机译：速度需求：口语阅读流利度与明尼苏达州综合阅读评估之间的关系。
6. The Utility and Accuracy of Oral Reading Fluency Score Types in Predicting Reading Comprehension [O] . Yaacov Petscher, Young-Suk Kim -1

机译：口腔读数流畅度评分类型预测阅读理解的实用性和准确性
7. Speed and accuracy in oral reading as a predictor of reading success : an evaluation of the fluency assessment screening test (F.A.S.T.) [O] . Demers Daniel D 1995

机译：口语阅读的速度和准确性可预测阅读成功：流畅性评估筛选测试的评估（F.A.S.T.）

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY OF ORAL READING FLUENCY AND MAZE IN PREDICTING PERFORMANCE ON LARGE-SCALE READING ASSESSMENTS

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅