...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Surgery >Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982-989).
【24h】

Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982-989).

机译：比较腹腔镜手术和开腹手术治疗直肠癌患者的随机临床试验（Br J Surg 2009; 96：982-989）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Sir We read with great interest the article by Lujan and colleagues comparing the use of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for rectal cancer.This study has shown a significant difference in the mean number of isolated lymph nodes after laparoscopic and open surgery (13.63 versus 11.57; P = 0.026). Differing numbers of isolated lymph nodes between the operative techniques continues to be a dominant discussion in our clinic. We were unable to explain the observed difference because both technical procedures use the same plane of dissection, referred to as the 'holy plane'. Although the discussion of these operative techniques with respect to lymph nodes remains a current topic within recent literature, we were unable to identify any randomized controlled trials or case-control studies showing a significant difference in the number of isolated lymph nodes.
机译：爵士先生，我们非常感兴趣地阅读了Lujan及其同事比较腹腔镜和开放式手术治疗直肠癌的文章。这项研究表明，腹腔镜和开放式手术后分离出的淋巴结平均数存在显着差异（13.63比11.57; P = 0.026）。手术技术之间隔离淋巴结数目的差异仍然是我们诊所的主要讨论。我们无法解释观察到的差异，因为这两种技术程序都使用相同的解剖平面，称为“神圣平面”。尽管关于淋巴结的这些手术技术的讨论仍然是近期文献中的当前话题，但我们无法确定任何显示出分离的淋巴结数目差异显着的随机对照试验或病例对照研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号