• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of forensic psychiatry & psychology >The truth and nothing but the truth: Court-appointed forensic experts' experience with testifying and their perceptions of legal actors in criminal courts
【24h】

The truth and nothing but the truth: Court-appointed forensic experts' experience with testifying and their perceptions of legal actors in criminal courts

机译：真相，只有真相：法院指定的法医专家的证词经验和对刑事法庭中法人的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We examined forensic psychiatric experts' experiences in providing court testimony and their cooperation with legal professionals, with 147 forensic psychiatric experts (psychologists and psychiatrists) responding to an online survey. Most experts reported that they liked their work, and were satisfied with their cooperation with the court, though their worst fear was that they themselves may commit errors. The experts reported that the most relevant questions in court came from the judges, followed by questions from the prosecutors. Leading and aggressively formulated questions were most often characterized as poor and irrelevant types of questions, particularly when they come from attorneys. Most experts preferred structured and prepared practitioners, while only 35% of the experts used special presentation techniques themselves to deliver their testimonies in court, thereby leaving a clear potential for an improvement in communication.
机译：我们调查了法医精神病专家在提供法庭证词方面的经验以及他们与法律专业人士的合作，我们对147名法医精神病专家（心理学家和精神病学家）进行了在线调查。大多数专家报告说，他们喜欢他们的工作，并对与法院的合作感到满意，尽管他们最担心的是自己可能犯错。专家报告说，法庭上最相关的问题来自法官，其次是检察官的问题。引导性问题和主动提出的问题通常被认为是问题的类型无关紧要，特别是当它们来自律师时。大多数专家更喜欢有条理和有准备的从业人员，而只有35％的专家自己使用特殊的演讲技巧在法庭上发表证词，从而在交流方面留有明显的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号