首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics: a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics >Disability and Capability: Exploring the Usefulness of Martha Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach for the UN Disability Rights Convention
【24h】

Disability and Capability: Exploring the Usefulness of Martha Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach for the UN Disability Rights Convention

机译:残疾与能力:探讨玛莎·努斯鲍姆(Martha Nussbaum)的能力方法对《联合国残疾人权利公约》的用处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I explore the usefulness of Martha Nussbaum's capabilities approach in regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The CRPD aims at empowering people with disabilities by granting them a number of civil and political, but also economic, social and cultural rights. Implementing the CRPD will clearly be politically challenging and also very expensive for states. Thus, questions might arise as to whether the requirements set in the CRPD can be justified from an ethical perspective. I will first investigate if Nussbaum's capabilities approach provides support for the rights claimed in the CRPD. Second, I will investigate to what extent Nussbaum's capabilities approach is a useful tool to set priorities among rights in the course of the implementation of the convention. This is an urgent question because seen realistically, it will not be possible to realize all rights at once and thus some rights need to receive greater priority than others. I will argue that the capabilities approach can be regarded as supporting the rights specified in the CRPD, but that it proves unable to guide the implementation process due to an insufficient grounding of the capabilities. Employing the capabilities approach thus leads to only limited results.
机译:我探讨了玛莎·努斯鲍姆(Martha Nussbaum)的能力方法对于《联合国残疾人权利公约》(CRPD)的有用性。 《残疾人权利公约》旨在通过赋予残疾人一些公民和政治权利,以及经济,社会和文化权利,增强残疾人的能力。实施《残疾人权利公约》显然在政治上具有挑战性,并且对各州来说也非常昂贵。因此,可能会产生疑问,即从道德的角度来看,《残疾人权利公约》中设定的要求是否合理。我将首先研究Nussbaum的能力方法是否为CRPD中主张的权利提供支持。其次,我将研究努斯鲍姆的能力方法在多大程度上是在执行公约过程中确定各项权利之间优先次序的有用工具。这是一个紧迫的问题,因为从现实角度看,不可能一次实现所有权利,因此某些权利需要比其他权利享有更高的优先权。我将争辩说,能力方法可以被视为支持CRPD中指定的权利,但是由于能力的基础不足,它无法指导实施过程。因此,采用能力方法只会导致有限的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号