• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Male homosexuality: nature or culture?
【24h】

Male homosexuality: nature or culture?

机译：男性同性恋：自然还是文化？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Debate continues on whether or not male homosexuality (MH) is a result of biological or cultural factors. The debate persists despite the fact that these two sides have different abilities to create a scientific environment to support their cause. Biological theorists produced evidence, however, that these are not always robust. On the other hand, social theorists, without direct evidence confirming their positions, criticize, with good argument, methods and results of the other side. The aim of this Controversy is to understand the reasons of both perspectives. METHODS: Two scientists (R.B. and A.C.C.) with expertise in the area of biology of MH were asked to contribute their opinions. The nurture position is discussed by a third expert in sexology (J.B.). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Expert opinion supported by the critical review of the currently available literature. RESULT: The role of the Controversy's editor (E.A.J.) is to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of both sides. The two experts of the biological issue answer with their data to the questions: "Is male homosexuality partly explainable by immunology?" and "How is male homosexuality a Darwinian paradox?", respectively. Genetic and immunological factors, birth order, and fertility of relatives are largely discussed. Finally, the expert sustaining the idea that culture and experiences are important determining factors in sexual orientation used a psychosocial and holistic perspective to explain his position. CONCLUSIONS: The JSM's readers should recognize that there are several biological factors in MH. However, these findings do not seem to be able to explain all cases of homosexuality. Some others may be due to particular environmental factors. The issue is complicated and multifactorial, suggesting that further research should be undertaken to produce the final answer to the question raised in this Controversy section.
机译：简介：关于男性同性恋（MH）是否是生物学或文化因素的结果，争论仍在继续。尽管双方在创造支持其事业的科学环境方面具有不同的能力，但辩论仍在继续。生物理论家提供了证据，但是，这些证据并不总是很可靠。另一方面，没有直接证据证实其立场的社会理论家以良好的论据批评对方的方法和结果。这场争论的目的是了解两种观点的原因。方法：要求两名在MH生物学领域具有专业知识的科学家（R.B.和A.C.C.）发表他们的意见。性学立场由性学第三位专家（J.B.）讨论。主要观察指标：专家意见得到当前文献的严格审查的支持。结果：争议的编辑（E.A.J.）的作用是突出双方的优点和缺点。这位生物学问题的两位专家用他们的数据回答了以下问题：“男性同性恋可以通过免疫学部分解释吗？”和“男性同性恋如何成为达尔文式的悖论？”。遗传和免疫学因素，出生顺序和亲戚的生育能力被大量讨论。最后，专家坚持认为文化和经验是性取向的重要决定因素，他用社会心理和整体视角来解释自己的立场。结论：JSM的读者应认识到MH中存在多种生物学因素。但是，这些发现似乎无法解释所有同性恋案例。其他一些可能是由于特定的环境因素。这个问题是复杂和多因素的，这表明应该进行进一步的研究，以最终解决这个有争议部分中提出的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号