...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agrarian Change >The Dark Side of Political Society: Patronage and the Reproduction of Social Inequality
【24h】

The Dark Side of Political Society: Patronage and the Reproduction of Social Inequality

机译：政治社会的阴暗面：赞助和社会不平等的再现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Development optimists in South Asia have argued that electoral politics and the reduced role of villages as centres of economic activity have largely put an end to exploitation by dominant castes. Although the political arrangements that have emergedout of these changes fall short of the idealized standards of civil society, various commentators have argued that they nevertheless benefit subordinate classes. Partha Chatteijee even argues that the ad hoc and extra-legal nature of these political arrangements - which he terms ‘political society’ - actually serve popular enfranchisement better than the law-bound activities of civil society, which he sees as captive to capital. On the basis of village ethnography from the Pakistani Punjab, I argue that political society is in fact integral to processes that dispossess people of their rights and to the reproduction of elite power. The paper illustrates how it is not the cold rationality of the state and the rule of law that disenfranchise subordinateclasses, but their absence.
机译：南亚的发展乐观主义者认为，选举政治和乡村作为经济活动中心的作用减弱，已在很大程度上终结了占统治地位的种姓的剥削。尽管由于这些变化而产生的政治安排没有达到公民社会理想化的标准，但各种评论家都认为，尽管如此，他们仍使下属阶级受益。查塔吉（Partha Chatteijee）甚至辩称，这些政治安排的临时性和法外性质（他称其为“政治社会”）实际上比民间社会的法律约束活动对民权有更好的作用，他认为民间社会有法律约束力的活动是资本的俘虏。根据巴基斯坦旁遮普邦的乡村人种志，我认为政治社会实际上是剥夺人民权利的过程以及精英力量再生产的组成部分。本文说明了剥夺下属阶级特权的不是国家和法治的冷漠理性，而是他们的缺席。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号