• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >Integrity Tests Predict Counterproductive Work Behaviors and Job Performance Well: Comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012)
【24h】

Integrity Tests Predict Counterproductive Work Behaviors and Job Performance Well: Comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012)

机译：完整性测试可以很好地预测适得其反的工作行为和工作绩效：评Van Iddekinge，Roth，Raymark和Odle-Dusseau（2012）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Examination of the Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012) meta-analysis reveals a number of problems. They meta-analyzed a partial database of integrity test validities. An examination of their coded database revealed that measures coded as integrity tests and meta-analyzed as such often included scales that are not in fact integrity tests. In addition, there were important deficiencies in their analytic approach relating to application of range restriction corrections and identification of moderators. We found the absence of fully hierarchical moderator analyses to be a serious weakness. We also explain why empirical comparisons between test publishers versus non-publishers cannot unambiguously lead to inferences of bias, as alternate explanations are possible, even likely. In light of the problems identified, it appears that the conclusions about integrity test validity drawn by Van Iddekinge et al. cannot be considered accurate or reliable.
机译：Van Iddekinge，Roth，Raymark和Odle-Dusseau（2012）的荟萃分析揭示了许多问题。他们对完整性测试有效性的部分数据库进行了荟萃分析。对他们编码数据库的检查显示，编码为完整性测试并进行荟萃分析的度量通常包括实际上不是完整性测试的量表。此外，在应用范围限制修正和确定主持人的分析方法上还存在重大缺陷。我们发现缺少完全分层的主持人分析是一个严重的弱点。我们还解释了为什么测试发布者与非发布者之间的经验比较不能明确地导致偏差的推断，因为有可能甚至有可能做出其他解释。鉴于已发现的问题，似乎由Van Iddekinge等人得出的关于完整性测试有效性的结论。不能被认为是准确或可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号