• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between General Mental Ability and Nontask Performance
【24h】

A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between General Mental Ability and Nontask Performance

机译：综合心理能力与非任务绩效之间关系的Meta分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although one of the most well-established research findings in industrial- organizational psychology is that general mental ability (GMA) is a strong and generalizable predictor of job performance, this meta-analytically derived conclusion is based largely on measures of task or overall performance. The primary purpose of this study is to address a void in the research literature by conducting a meta-analysis to determine the direction and magnitude of the correlation of GMA with 2 dimensions of nontask performance: counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) and organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB). Overall, the results show that the true-score correlation between GMA and CWB is essentially 0 (-.02, k =35), although rating source of CWB moderates this relationship. The true-score correlation between GMA and OCB is positive but modest in magnitude (.23, k = 43). The 2nd purpose of this study is to conduct meta-analytic relative weight analyses to determine the relative importance of GMA and the five-factor model (FFM) of personality traits in predicting nontask and task performance criteria. Results indicate that, collectively, the FFM traits are substantially more important for CWB than GMA, that the FFM traits are roughly equal in importance to GMA for OCB, and that GMA is substantially more important for task and overall job performance than the FFM traits. Implications of these findings for the development of optimal selection systems and the development of comprehensive theories of job performance are discussed along with study limitation and future research directions.
机译：尽管在产业组织心理学中最完善的研究发现之一是，一般心理能力（GMA）是工作绩效的强大且可概括的预测指标，但这种基于荟萃分析得出的结论主要基于任务或总体绩效的度量。这项研究的主要目的是通过进行荟萃分析来确定GMA与非任务绩效的两个维度之间的相关性的方向和大小，以解决研究文献中的空白：适得其反的工作行为（CWB）和组织公民行为（ OCB）。总体而言，结果表明，尽管CWB的评分来源缓解了这种关系，但GMA和CWB之间的真实得分相关性基本上为0（-。02，k = 35）。 GMA和OCB之间的真实得分相关性为正，但大小适中（.23，k = 43）。这项研究的第二个目的是进行荟萃分析相对权重分析，以确定GMA和人格特质的五因素模型（FFM）在预测非任务和任务执行标准时的相对重要性。结果表明，总体而言，FFM特性对CWB的重要性远大于GMA，FFM特性对于OCB的重要性与GMA大致相等，并且GMA对于任务和总体工作绩效的重要性远大于FFM特性。讨论了这些发现对最佳选择系统的发展和工作绩效综合理论的发展的意义，以及研究的局限性和未来的研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号