• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >The depth of history and explanation as benefit and bane for psychological control theories
【24h】

The depth of history and explanation as benefit and bane for psychological control theories

机译：历史的深度和解释对心理控制理论的好处和不利之处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A longstanding debate has recently re-erupted in the self-regulation literature around the concept of self-efficacy. This article presents an argument that the debate emerges from a lack of understanding of the history of control theories within both the social and physical sciences and the various levels of explanation to which phenomena can be subjected. This history, coupled with the issues of determinism, materialism, and empiricism evoked by the deeper level of explanation that some versions of control theory provide has led some critics to misapply nonpsychological properties to control theories and obscure their usefulness. Here, the usefulness of a deeper control theory level of explanation is illustrated using comparisons with explanations found in goal-setting theory and social cognitive theory.
机译：最近，关于自我效能感概念的自我调节文献重新引发了长期争论。本文提出了一种论点，即辩论是由于对社会科学和物理科学以及对现象可能会受到的各种解释级别的了解不足而引起的。这段历史，再加上确定性，唯物主义和经验主义的问题，一些控制理论版本提供了更深层次的解释，从而引发了一些批评家误用非心理学特性来控制理论并掩盖了它们的实用性。在此，通过与目标设定理论和社会认知理论中的解释进行比较，来说明更深层次的控制理论解释的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号