• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Entomology >Comparative study of integrated pest management and baiting for German cockroach management in public housing
【24h】

Comparative study of integrated pest management and baiting for German cockroach management in public housing

机译：公共房屋中德国蟑螂综合防治害虫和诱饵的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study assessed the cost and effectiveness of a building-wide cockroach integrated pest management (IPM) program compared with bait alone treatment in public housing. In total, 12 buildings (66 apartments) were treated and monitored for cockroach infestations over 7 mo. The buildings were divided into two groups: bait treatment and IPM. Apartments in the bait alone group were treated with Maxforce FC Select (0.01% fipronil) during the first 12 wk and Maxforce Roach Killer Bait Gel (2.15% hydramethylnon) from 16 wk when necessary. For the IPM group, cockroaches were flushed and vacuumed at the beginning of the study; sticky traps were placed in all apartments to monitor and reduce cockroach numbers; educational materials were delivered to the residents; and Maxforce FC Select and Maxforce Roach Killer Bait Gel were applied to kill cockroaches. Two seminars were presented to the manger, and Community Service Program staff of the Gary Housing Authority to help gain tenant cooperation in the program. Effects of the treatments were monitored using sticky traps (six per apartment) at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 29 wk after treatment. More treatments were applied during each monitoring visit when necessary. Those apartments with high levels of infestations (>= 12 cockroaches in six traps) before treatment were used to compare the IPM and bait only treatments. IPM resulted in significantly greater trap catch reduction than the bait treatment. The IPM (n = 12) and bait only treatment (n = 11) resulted in 100.0 and 94.6%, respectively, reduction in trap catch after 16 wk. At 29 wk, only one apartment in the IPM group had a high level (> 12 cockroaches) of cockroach infestation. In contrast, five apartments in the bait treatment group had high level infestations at 29 wk based on overnight trapping counts; thus, IPM is a more sustainable method of population reduction. Sanitation levels in the IPM group significantly improved at 29 wk (n = 11) compared with that at the beginning of the study. The sanitation levels in the bait treatment group, remained similar throughout the experiment (n = 9). The cumulative cost of IPM was significantly higher than that of the bait treatment. The median costs per apartment during 29 wk were
机译：这项研究评估了与公共房屋中单独诱饵处理相比，整个建筑物内蟑螂综合有害生物管理（IPM）计划的成本和有效性。总共对12栋建筑物（66套公寓）进行了处理，并监测了超过7个月的蟑螂侵扰。这些建筑物分为两组：诱饵处理和IPM。仅诱饵组的公寓在头12周内接受Maxforce FC Select（0.01％氟虫腈）治疗，必要时从16周起接受Maxforce Roach Killer Bait Gel（2.15％hydramethylnon）治疗。对于IPM组，在研究开始时将蟑螂冲洗干净并吸尘。所有公寓都放置了粘性诱捕器，以监测和减少蟑螂数量;教育资料已分发给居民;使用Maxforce FC Select和Maxforce Roach Killer Bait Gel杀灭蟑螂。向加里住房管理局的经理和社区服务计划工作人员举办了两次研讨会，以帮助在计划中获得房客合作。在治疗后第2、4、8、12、16和29周使用粘性陷阱（每间公寓六个）监测治疗效果。必要时，在每次监测访问期间应采用更多治疗方法。治疗前那些侵染程度高的公寓（六个陷阱中> = 12只蟑螂）用于比较IPM和仅诱饵治疗。与诱饵处理相比，IPM导致的诱捕量大大减少。 IPM（n = 12）和仅诱饵处理（n = 11）在16周后分别减少了100.0和94.6％的陷阱捕获量。在29周时，IPM组中只有一间公寓的蟑螂感染水平很高（> 12只蟑螂）。相比之下，根据过夜诱捕计数，诱饵治疗组中的5套公寓在29周时有高水平的侵扰。因此，IPM是一种更可持续的减少人口数量的方法。与研究开始时相比，IPM组的卫生水平在29周（n = 11）时显着提高。在整个实验过程中，诱饵治疗组的卫生水平保持相似（n = 9）。 IPM的累积成本明显高于诱饵处理。在29周内，每套公寓的平均费用为

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号