...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean medical science >The Legal Doctrine on 'Limitation of Liability' in the Precedent Analysis on Plastic Surgery Medical Malpractice Lawsuits
【24h】

The Legal Doctrine on 'Limitation of Liability' in the Precedent Analysis on Plastic Surgery Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

机译：整形外科医疗事故诉讼案例分析中“责任限制”的法律学说

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study intended to review the precedents on plastic surgery medical malpractice lawsuits in lower-court trials, classify the reasons of 'limitation of liability' by type, and suggest a standard in the acknowledgement of limitation of liability ratio. The 30 lower-court's rulings on the cases bearing the medical negligence of the defendants acknowledged the liability ratio of the defendants between 30% and 100%. Ten cases ruled that the defendants were wholly responsible for the negligence or malpractice, while 20 cases acknowledged the limitation of liability principle. In the determination of damage compensation amount, the court considered the cause of the victim side, which contributed in the occurrence of the damage. The court also believed that it is against the idea of fairness to have the assailant pay the whole compensation, even there is no victim-side cause such as previous illness or physical constitution of the patient, and applies the legal doctrine on limitation of liability, which is an independent damage compensation adjustment system. Most of the rulings also limited the ratio of responsibility to certain extent. When considering that the legal doctrine on limitation of liability which supports concrete validity for the fair sharing of damage, the tangible classification of causes of limitation of liability suggested in this study would be a useful tool in forecasting the ruling of a plastic surgery medical malpractice lawsuit.
机译：这项研究的目的是回顾下庭审判中整形外科医疗事故诉讼的先例，按类型对“责任限制”的原因进行分类，并提出责任限制比率确认的标准。下级法院关于被告人医疗过失案件的30项裁定，承认被告人的责任比例在30％至100％之间。十起案件裁定被告对过失或渎职行为负全部责任，而二十起案件承认责任限制原则。在确定损害赔偿金额时，法院考虑了受害方的原因，造成损害的发生。法院还认为，即使没有任何受害人方面的原因，例如先前的疾病或患者的身体构造，也要由袭击者全额赔偿，这是不公平的想法，并且对责任限制适用法律原则，这是一个独立的损害赔偿调整系统。大多数裁定还在一定程度上限制了责任比例。当考虑到责任限制的法律学说支持公平分配损害的具体效力时，本研究建议的责任限制原因的有形分类将是预测整形外科医疗事故诉讼裁决的有用工具。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号