首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational health psychology >Going to Work Ill: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of Presenteeism and a Dual-Path Model
【24h】

Going to Work Ill: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of Presenteeism and a Dual-Path Model

机译:患病上班:呈现主义和双路径模型相关性的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Interest in presenteeism, attending work while ill, has flourished in light of its consequences for individual well-being and organizational productivity. Our goal was to identify its most significant causes and correlates by quantitatively summarizing the extant research. Additionally, we built an empirical model of some key correlates and compared the etiology of presenteeism versus absenteeism. We used meta-analysis (in total, K = 109 samples, N = 175,965) to investigate the correlates of presenteeism and meta-analytic structural equation modeling to test the empirical model. Salient correlates of working while ill included general ill health, constraints on absenteeism (e.g., strict absence policies, job insecurity), elevated job demands and felt stress, lack of job and personal resources (e.g., low support and low optimism), negative relational experiences (e.g., perceived discrimination), and positive attitudes (satisfaction, engagement, and commitment). Moreover, our dual process model clarified how job demands and job and personal resources elicit presenteeism via both health impairment and motivational paths, and they explained more variation in presenteeism than absenteeism. The study sheds light on the controversial act of presenteeism, uncovering both positive and negative underlying mechanisms. The greater variance explained in presenteeism as opposed to absenteeism underlines the opportunities for researchers to meaningfully investigate the behavior and for organizations to manage it.
机译:鉴于患病感冒对个人福祉和组织生产力的影响,人们对表现主义的兴趣日益浓厚,病假时参加工作。我们的目标是通过定量总结现有研究来确定其最重要的原因并建立关联。此外,我们建立了一些关键关联的经验模型,并比较了出席者和缺勤的病因。我们使用了荟萃分析(总共,K = 109个样本,N = 175,965)来研究呈现主义和荟萃分析结构方程模型之间的相关性,以检验经验模型。患病时工作的显着相关因素包括总体疾病,旷工的限制(例如严格的缺勤政策,工作不安全感),工作需求增加和感到压力,缺乏工作和个人资源(例如,低支持度和低乐观度),负面关系经验(例如,感知到的歧视)和积极态度(满意,参与和承诺)。此外,我们的双重过程模型阐明了工作需求以及工作和个人资源如何通过健康损害和动机途径激发出席者,并且他们解释了出席者而非旷工的差异。该研究揭示了存在主义的争议行为,揭示了积极和消极的潜在机制。与旷工相比,出席者主义解释的差异更大,这表明研究人员有机会有意义地调查行为并由组织进行管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号