...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology: official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology >Cost-effectiveness of cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty. A Markov decision analysis based on implant cost
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty. A Markov decision analysis based on implant cost

机译:骨水泥与非骨水泥全髋关节置换术的成本效益。基于植入物成本的马尔可夫决策分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Probabilistic decision analysis is a means of reflecting the uncertainty parameter in models and of presenting it in a comprehensible manner to decision-makers. Materials and methods A cost-effectiveness model was constructed to compare the cementless and cemented total hip prostheses implanted at our department in terms of lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Revision rates were obtained from the Orthopaedic Prosthesis Register of the Laboratory of Medical Technology, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. Results The risk of early revision (at 5 years of follow-up) for cementless and cemented prostheses was 1.6% and 1.4%, respectively, resulting in equal QALY for the two im- plant types. Analysis of mean cost and QALY indicated that use of either implant is not associated with cost savings. Discussion. Management with cementless or cemented total hip prostheses in a theoretical cohort of 70-year-old patients with fracture of the femoral neck or arthritis involving the hip is not significantly different according to the probabilistic results from the model.
机译:概率决策分析是一种在模型中反映不确定性参数并将其以可理解的方式呈现给决策者的方法。材料和方法建立了成本效益模型,以比较我们部门植入的非骨水泥和骨水泥全髋关节假体的终生成本和经质量调整的生命年限(QALY)。修订率来自意大利博洛尼亚Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli医学技术实验室的骨科假体登记册。结果非骨水泥假牙和骨水泥假牙的早期翻修风险(随访5年)分别为1.6%和1.4%,导致两种植入物的QALY相等。平均成本和QALY的分析表明,使用任何一种植入物都不会节省成本。讨论。根据该模型的概率结果,在理论队列中的70岁患有股骨颈骨折或髋部关节炎的患者中,采用非骨水泥或骨水泥全髋关节假体的处理无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号