首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Social Psychology >Rethinking procrastination: Positive effects of 'active' procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance
【24h】

Rethinking procrastination: Positive effects of 'active' procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance

机译:重新思考拖延:“主动”拖延行为对态度和表现的积极影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Researchers and practitioners have long regarded procrastination as a self-handicapping and dysfunctional behavior. In the present study, the authors proposed that not all procrastination behaviors either are harmful or lead to negative consequences. Specifically, the authors differentiated two types of procrastinators: passive procrastinators versus active procrastinators. Passive procrastinators are procrastinators in the traditional sense. They are paralyzed by their indecision to act and fail to complete tasks on time. In contrast, active procrastinators are a "positive" type of procrastinator. They prefer to work under pressure, and they make deliberate decisions to procrastinate. The present results showed that although active procrastinators procrastinate to the same degree as passive procrastinators, they are more similar to nonprocrastinators than to passive procrastinators in terms of purposive use of time, control of time, self-efficacy belief, coping styles, and outcomes including academic performance. The present findings offer a more sophisticated understanding of procrastination behavior and indicate a need to reevaluate its implications for outcomes of individuals.
机译:研究人员和从业人员长期以来一直将拖延症视为一种自我阻碍和功能失调的行为。在本研究中,作者提出并非所有的拖延行为都是有害的或导致负面后果。具体来说,作者将拖延症分为两种类型:被动拖延症和主动拖延症。被动拖延者是传统意义上的拖延者。优柔寡断的行为使他们瘫痪,无法按时完成任务。相反,主动拖延者是拖延者的“积极”类型。他们喜欢在压力下工作,并做出刻意拖延的决定。目前的结果表明,尽管主动拖延者的拖延程度与被动拖延者的拖延程度相同,但在目的性使用时间,时间控制,自我效能感,应对方式以及包括以下方面的结果方面,他们与非拖延者比被动拖延者更相似学业成绩。本研究结果提供了对拖延行为的更复杂的理解,并表明需要重新评估其对个人结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号