• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine: An International Journal Devoted to the Development, Implementation and Exchange of Computing Methodology and Software Systems in Biomedical Research and Medical Practice >Lessons learned from the implementation of remote control for the interoperability standard ISO/IEEE11073-20601 in a standard weighing scale
【24h】

Lessons learned from the implementation of remote control for the interoperability standard ISO/IEEE11073-20601 in a standard weighing scale

机译：在标准秤中通过互操作性标准ISO / IEEE11073-20601的远程控制实施获得的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Point of Care (PoC) version of the interoperability standard ISO/IEEE11073 (X73) provided a mechanism to control remotely agents through documents X73-10201 and X73-20301. The newer version of X73 oriented to Personal Health Devices (PHD) has no mechanisms to do such a thing. The authors are working toward a common proposal with the PHD Working Group (PHD-WG) in order to adapt the remote control capabilities from X73PoC to X73PHD. However, this theoretical adaptation has to be implemented and tested to evaluate whether or not its inclusion entails an acceptable overhead and extra cost. Such proof-of-concept assessment is the main objective of this paper. For the sake of simplicity, a weighing scale with a configurable operation was chosen as use case. First, in a previous stage of the research - the model was defined. Second, the implementation methodology - both in terms of hardware and software - was defined and executed. Third, an evaluation methodology to test the remote control features was defined. Then, a thorough comparison between a weighing scale with and without remote control was performed. The results obtained indicate that, when implementing remote control in a weighing scale, the relative weight of such feature represents an overhead of as much as 53%, whereas the number of Implementation Conformance Statements (ICSs) to be satisfied by the manufacturer represent as much as 34% regarding the implementation without remote control. The new feature facilitates remote control of PHDs but, at the same time, increases overhead and costs, and, therefore, manufacturers need to weigh this trade-off. As a conclusion, this proof-of-concept helps in fostering the evolution of the remote control proposal to extend X73PHD and promotes its inclusion as part of the standard, as well as it illustrates the methodological steps for its extrapolation to other specializations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：互操作性标准ISO / IEEE11073（X73）的即时点（PoC）版本提供了一种通过文档X73-10201和X73-20301远程控制代理的机制。面向个人健康设备（PHD）的X73的较新版本没有执行此操作的机制。作者正在努力与PHD工作组（PHD-WG）达成一项共同提案，以使远程控制功能从X73PoC适应X73PHD。但是，必须对这种理论适应性进行实施和测试，以评估其包含是否带来可接受的开销和额外成本。这种概念验证评估是本文的主要目标。为了简单起见，选择了具有可配置操作的秤作为用例。首先，在研究的先前阶段-模型已定义。其次，定义并执行了实施方法-包括硬件和软件。第三，定义了一种评估远程控制功能的评估方法。然后，对带有和不带有远程控制的秤进行了彻底的比较。所获得的结果表明，在秤中实施远程控制时，此功能的相对重量代表多达53％的开销，而制造商要满足的实施符合性声明（ICS）的数量代表在没有遥控器的情况下占34％。这项新功能有助于对PHD进行远程控制，但同时又增加了开销和成本，因此制造商需要权衡这一权衡。结论是，此概念证明有助于促进扩展X73PHD的远程控制提案的发展，并促进其作为标准的一部分，并说明将其扩展到其他专业的方法步骤。 （C）2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号