...
首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in anaesthesiology >Regional anaesthesia and perioperative outcome.
【24h】

Regional anaesthesia and perioperative outcome.

机译:区域麻醉和围手术期结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The ongoing debate on the outcome benefits of regional anaesthesia and analgesia over general anaesthesia and systemic analgesia has led to a large number of recently published papers, in particular systematic reviews and metaanalyses that justify a review of the current status of the debate. RECENT FINDINGS: Metaanalyses have shown consistently improved analgesia with epidural techniques, but the results are by far less consistent with regard to other outcomes, in particular morbidity and mortality. Specific outcomes in specific types of surgery, however, such as bowel recovery after abdominal surgery, can be improved by neuraxial blockade, which also remains the technique of choice for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia. In certain indications, peripheral nerve blocks may have the potential to replace neuraxial blocks while maintaining the benefits of the regional technique, such as paravertebral blocks for thoracotomies. SUMMARY: Although there are a considerable number of recentpublications on the topic, the complex issues around the effect of regional anaesthesia on outcome is not completely resolved, possibly because the data are often not procedure specific. In addition, however, it may be that our current literature cannot provide a definitive answer.
机译:审查的目的:关于区域麻醉和镇痛相对于全身麻醉和全身性镇痛的结局益处的持续辩论导致了最近发表的大量论文,特别是系统的综述和荟萃分析,证明对辩论的现状进行了回顾。最近的发现:荟萃分析显示硬膜外麻醉技术能够持续改善镇痛效果,但与其他结局(尤其是发病率和死亡率)相比,结果却相去甚远。然而,特定类型手术的特定结果(例如腹部手术后的肠恢复)可通过神经轴阻滞得到改善,这仍然是产科镇痛和麻醉的首选技术。在某些适应症中,周围神经阻滞可能具有替代神经阻滞的潜力,同时又保留了局部技术的优势,例如开胸手术的椎旁阻滞。简介:尽管有关该主题的最新出版物很多,但是围绕区域麻醉对结果的影响的复杂问题尚未完全解决,这可能是因为数据通常不是特定于手术的。但是,此外,可能我们现有的文献无法提供明确的答案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号