• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Emergence of the third culture
【24h】

Emergence of the third culture

机译：第三文化的出现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The editorial in Current Science (2001, 80, 1361-1362) about the emergence of the third culture made interesting reading. Both sciences and humanities existed side by side as academic disciplines in our education system. Study of the classics and languages was compulsory in the universities of Europe till the end of the eighteenth century. There was no rift between the sciences and humanities betore the Industrial Revolution in Europe. The dramatic growth of science, particularly physics, during the last century created a wedge between science and humanities, thus giving rise to the 'two-culture' hypothesis. In India, we followed a lop-sided educational policy. Alter independence, general science was first introduced as an optional subject in high schools. During the sixties, it was introduced as a compulsory subject, with stress on physics and chemistry. Science was further classified into medical and non-medical streams at the 10 + 2 level in schools, with little chance to change over from one stream after that stage. Such rigidity has proved harmful to the development of modern biology, specially biophysics, in India.
机译：《现代科学》（Current Science）（2001，80，1361-1362）中有关第三种文化出现的社论引起了有趣的阅读。科学和人文学科在我们的教育体系中作为学术学科并存。直到18世纪末，欧洲的大学都必须学习经典和语言。在科学和人文科学之间，欧洲的工业革命之间没有裂痕。在上个世纪，科学，特别是物理学的迅猛发展在科学与人文科学之间建立了楔子，从而产生了“两种文化”假说。在印度，我们遵循偏向教育的政策。改变独立性之后，普通科学首先在高中时作为选修科目引入。在六十年代，它作为一门必修课被介绍，着重于物理和化学。在学校中，将科学进一步分为10 + 2级的医学和非医学流，在此阶段之后几乎没有机会从一个流转换。事实证明，这种刚性对印度现代生物学特别是生物物理学的发展有害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号