...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >What Program Directors Think. Results of the 2011 Annual Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology.
【24h】

What Program Directors Think. Results of the 2011 Annual Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology.

机译：计划主管的想法。放射学项目主任协会2011年年度调查结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Rationale and Objectives: The Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) conducts an annual survey to monitor and evaluate issues pertaining to radiology residents' educational experiences, work responsibilities, and benefits. Data are used to identify emerging trends and patterns of change to plan and provide resources that support radiology residency programs and their directors. Materials and Methods: The APDR Annual Survey Committee selected 59 items for an observational, cross-sectional study using a Web-based survey. Topics of interest included program director satisfaction, resident recruitment, social media, program requirements, curriculum, the new American Board of Radiology exam process, call, and residents-as-teachers programs. All active APDR members (n = 296) were invited to participate in survey between February 20 and March 11, 2011. Results: The response rate was 47% (140 of 296). Descriptive results were tallied using SurveyMonkey software, and qualitative responses were tabulated or summarized as comments. Findings were reported during the 59th annual meeting of the Association of University Radiologists. Conclusions: Data generated by the annual survey enable the APDR to accrue data pertaining to residents' real-time educational experiences. In 2011, program directors were satisfied with their jobs but not convinced that competency-based program requirements had positive effect on residency training. Programs plan to use the Radiological Society of North America and American Association of Physicists in Medicine Web-based physics training modules. Most radiology programs do not have residents-as-teachers programs, nor do they plan to initiate them. During recruitment, programs use an applicant's location as a proxy for true interest in the program, and interest in the program is important for granting interviews and final ranking. Qualified international medical graduate applicants have access to radiology training in the United States and Canada. Almost half of radiology programs have in-house reading by attending radiologists with residents on call. Residency programs have been slow to embrace social media.
机译：理由和目标：放射学项目主任协会（APDR）进行年度调查，以监视和评估与放射学居民的教育经历，工作职责和福利有关的问题。数据用于识别新出现的趋势和变化模式，以计划和提供支持放射科住院医师计划及其主管的资源。材料和方法：APDR年度调查委员会使用基于Web的调查选择了59项用于观察性横断面研究。感兴趣的主题包括计划主任满意度，居民招募，社交媒体，计划要求，课程，新的美国放射学委员会考试程序，电话和居民任教计划。 2011年2月20日至3月11日，邀请了所有活跃的APDR成员（n = 296）参加调查。结果：答复率为47％（296个中的140个）。使用SurveyMonkey软件记录描述性结果，并将定性反应制成表格或汇总为注释。在大学放射学家协会第59届年会上报告了研究结果。结论：年度调查生成的数据使APDR能够累积与居民的实时教育经历有关的数据。 2011年，计划主管对他们的工作感到满意，但不相信基于能力的计划要求对住院医师培训产生积极影响。该计划计划使用北美放射学会和美国医学物理学家协会基于网络的物理培训模块。大多数放射学计划没有居民任教计划，也没有计划启动这些计划。在招聘期间，计划会使用申请人的位置作为对计划真正兴趣的代理，而对计划的兴趣对于授予面试和最终排名很重要。合格的国际医学研究生申请者可以在美国和加拿大接受放射学培训。几乎有一半的放射学课程是由与会的居民在场的放射线医生进行内部阅读的。驻留计划在接受社交媒体方面进展缓慢。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号