Open the Floodgates: The Potential Impact on Litigation Against FDA if the Supreme Court Reverses or Curtails Chevron Deference

Landmon Chad; Alfano Alexander; Divelbiss Michelle

首页> 外文期刊>Food and Drug Law Journal >Open the Floodgates: The Potential Impact on Litigation Against FDA if the Supreme Court Reverses or Curtails Chevron Deference

【24h】

Open the Floodgates: The Potential Impact on Litigation Against FDA if the Supreme Court Reverses or Curtails Chevron Deference

机译：打开大闸门：如果最高法院逆转或削减雪佛龙望触，则对FDA诉讼的潜在影响

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The Supreme Court is drastically shifting, and several Supreme Court precedents may get a fresh look. The focus of this paper is on Chevron deference and what it could mean for FDA-regulated companies if FDA no longer has this powerful weapon in its arsenal. This paper is not an argument for or against Chevron deference, but simply provides an analysis of how certain cases could have turned out and what the future may look like with an even playing field.

机译：最高法院急剧转移，几个最高法院的先例可能会焕然一新。本文的重点是雪佛龙呼叫以及FDA监管公司可能意味着如果FDA不再拥有这种强大的武器在其阿森纳。本文不是雪佛龙赎息的论点，但只需分析某些案件可能已经出现的分析以及未来可能与偶数播放领域看起来像什么。

著录项

来源
《Food and Drug Law Journal》 |2019年第3期|共21页
作者
Landmon Chad; Alfano Alexander; Divelbiss Michelle;
展开▼
作者单位

Axinn Veltrop &

Harkrider LLP Firms FDA Grp New York NY 10036 USA;

Axinn New York NY USA;

Axinn New York NY USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类食品工业;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献

1. Open the Floodgates: The Potential Impact on Litigation Against FDA if the Supreme Court Reverses or Curtails Chevron Deference [J] . Landmon Chad, Alfano Alexander, Divelbiss Michelle Food and Drug Law Journal . 2019,第3期

机译：打开大闸门：如果最高法院逆转或削减雪佛龙望触，则对FDA诉讼的潜在影响
2. Daily Document Update: HR Compliance Library, ¶46,182, U.S. Supreme Court upholds Auer doctrine giving deference to agency interpretations of regulations - US SUPREME COURT DOCKET, (Jun. 27, 2019) [J] . Human resources management . 2019,第JUNa27期

机译：每日文件更新：《人力资源合规图书馆》，美国最高法院¶46,182，支持Auer原则，尊重机构对法规的解释-US SUPREME COURT DOCKET，（2019年6月27日）
3. Daily Document Update: HR Compliance Library, ¶46,182, U.S. Supreme Court upholds Auer doctrine giving deference to agency interpretations of regulations - US SUPREME COURT DOCKET, (Jun. 27, 2019) [J] . Human resources management . 2019,第Juna27期

机译：日常文件更新：人力资源合规图书馆，¶46,182，美国最高法院秉承肥胖主义，为法规解释提供尊重 - 美国最高法院唐克特（Jun。2019年6月27日）
4. Semiotic impacts of the supreme court's Mayo/Biosig/Alice decisions on legally analyzing emerging technology claimed inventions (ET CIs) [C] . Schindler Sigram SAI Intelligent Systems Conference . 2015

机译：最高法院的Mayo / Biosig / Alice判决对合法分析新兴技术主张的发明（ET CI）的符号学影响
5. The Supreme Court of Canada's multifactorial approach to deference in judicial review. [D] . Rodriguez Ferrere, M. B. 2012

机译：加拿大最高法院在司法审查中应遵循的多种因素处理方法。
6. Supreme Court rules that FDA cannot regulate tobacco industry [O] . Scott Gottlieb 2000

机译：最高法院裁定FDA无法规范烟草业
7. The Continuum of Deference: Supreme Court Treatment of Agency Statutory Interpretations from Chevron to Hamdan [O] . Eskridge, William N., Jr., Baer, Lauren E. 2008

机译：顺从连续体：最高法院对从雪佛龙到哈姆丹的机构法定解释的处理

Open the Floodgates: The Potential Impact on Litigation Against FDA if the Supreme Court Reverses or Curtails Chevron Deference

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅