• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Food Policy >Cultural worldview and genetically modified food policy preferences
【24h】

Cultural worldview and genetically modified food policy preferences

机译：文化世界观和转基因食品政策偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

After more than twenty years of persistent efforts to raise concern over the risk of consuming genetically modified (GM) foods, GM labeling proponents have more recently adopted the themes of: (1) environmental harm, (2) the collusion of big business and government, and (3) the "right to know" if food contains GM ingredients (Lendman, 2015). Proponents of mandatory labeling have been effective in mobilizing supporters around these themes which may influence individual-level support for different GM policy outcomes due to how these themes interact with a person's cultural values. Consequently, we use cultural cognition theory to explore the relationship between cultural worldview and preferences for GM policy. Using a survey, we first examine the effect of cultural worldview on consumers' preferences for voluntary and mandatory GM labeling programs. Second, using a choice experiment, we explore how cultural worldview influences consumer valuations of and willingness to pay for non-GM and GM food labels. Our results establish a reliable connection between cultural worldview and preferences for GM policy and preferences for GM labeling. As predicted by cultural cognition theory, the most dramatic differences exist between those with relatively egalitarian-communitarian and hierarchical-individualistic worldviews. Egalitarian-comnumitaricuis were 42% less likely to support change in the current voluntary approach and 79% more likely to support mandatory labeling than hierarchical-individualists; these individuals were also willing to pay about 67% more to avoid GM foods by purchasing products with a non-GMO label. Although important differences do exist, our research demonstrates that there is common ground and individual attitudes towards labeling can be mediated by cultural worldview.
机译：经过二十多年的持续努力，提高对遗传修改（GM）食品的风险的关注，GM标签支持者最近通过了以下主题：（1）环境危害，（2）大型企业和政府的勾结（3）如果食物含有GM成分（Lendman，2015），则“知道的权利”。强制标签的支持者在这些主题周围调动支持者，这可能会影响各个转基因政策结果的个人级别支持，因为这些主题如何与人的文化价值互动。因此，我们利用文化认知理论探索文化世界观与转基因政策的偏好关系。使用调查，我们首先审查文化世界观对消费者对自愿和强制性通用汽车标签计划的偏好的影响。其次，使用选择实验，我们探讨文化世界观如何影响非全球通用汽车和转基因食品标签的消费者估值和愿意。我们的结果在文化世界观和转基因标签的GM政策和偏好之间建立了可靠的联系。正如文化认知理论所预测的那样，具有相对平等的社群和分层 - 个人主义世界观的人之间存在最大的差异。平均 - 互联土的可能性较少42％，以支持当前自愿方法的变化，79％可能支持强制性标签而不是分层人员;这些人也愿意通过使用非转基因标签购买产品来支付大约67％以避免转基因食品。尽管存在重要的差异，但我们的研究表明，有共同的地面，并且可以通过文化世界观调解标签的个人态度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Food Policy》 |2018年第2018期|共16页
  • 作者

    Kemper Nathan P.; Popp Jennie S.; Nayga Rodolfo M. Jr.; Kerr J. Brinck;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Arkansas Dept Agr Econ &

    Agribusiness 217 Agr Bldg 1 Fayetteville AR 72701 USA;

    Univ Arkansas Honors Coll Fayetteville AR 72701 USA;

    Univ Arkansas Dept Agr Econ &

    Agribusiness Div Agr Fayetteville AR 72701 USA;

    Univ Arkansas Polit Sci Dept Fayetteville AR 72701 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号