...
首页> 外文期刊>Addictive behaviors >Drinking to enhance and to cope: a daily process study of motive specificity.
【24h】

Drinking to enhance and to cope: a daily process study of motive specificity.

机译:喝酒以增强和应对:动机特异性的日常研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Daily process studies of internal drinking motives have not examined motive specificity, i.e., whether theoretically plausible trait and situational antecedents differ in their ability to predict the extent to which alcohol consumption on any given day is motivated by coping or enhancement. METHOD: University students (N=81) completed trait measures of coping and enhancement-motivated drinking (trait CM and EM), sensation seeking, and conscientiousness, and then completed a 14-day online diary assessing daily completion of tasks, daily alcohol use, and (on days when alcohol was consumed) the extent to which drinking was motivated by coping or enhancement (daily CM and EM). RESULTS: Hierarchical linear models revealed unique situational and trait antecedents of daily CM and EM. In the daily EM drinking model, main effects of daily positive affect (b=0.11, p<0.05), trait EM (b=2.88, p<0.01), and trait sensation seeking (b=0.36, p<0.01) were qualified by cross-level interactions between daily task accomplishment and trait conscientiousness (b=0.03, p<0.01), and daily task accomplishment and trait sensation seeking (b=0.03, p<0.01). In the daily CM drinking model, main effects of daily positive affect (b=-0.08, p<0.05), daily negative affect (b=0.13, p<0.05), and trait CM (b=4.40, p<0.01), were qualified by cross-level interactions between trait CM and daily positive affect (b=-0.12, p<0.05), trait CM and daily negative affect (b=0.18, p<0.01), and trait conscientiousness and daily task accomplishment (b=0.01, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results replicated and extended Cooper et al.'s (1995) findings on the differential roles of sensation seeking and negative affect in CM and EM drinking at the daily level, and call into question the view that drinking motives should be solely conceptualized as individual difference variables. Theoretical and applied implications of the findings are discussed.
机译:目的:日常饮酒动机的每日过程研究并未检验动机的特异性,即,理论上合理的特征和情景先例在预测任何给定日饮酒的程度是由于应对还是增强动机上的能力是否不同。方法:81岁的大学生完成了应对和增强动机性饮酒的特质测量(特质CM和EM),寻求感觉和尽职调查,然后完成了为期14天的在线日记,评估每日的任务完成情况,每日饮酒量,以及(在饮酒的日子中)通过应对或增强来促进饮酒的程度(每日CM和EM)。结果:线性模型揭示了每日CM和EM的独特情况和特征前因。在每日EM饮酒模型中,合格的每日正面影响(b = 0.11,p <0.05),特质EM(b = 2.88,p <0.01)和寻求特质感(b = 0.36,p <0.01)的主要效应是合格的通过日常任务完成和特质尽责性之间的跨层次交互(b = 0.03,p <0.01)和日常任务完成和特质感寻求(b = 0.03,p <0.01)。在每日CM饮酒模型中,每日正面影响(b = -0.08,p <0.05),每日负面影响(b = 0.13,p <0.05)和性状CM(b = 4.40,p <0.01)的主要影响是,通过特质CM与每日正向情感(b = -0.12,p <0.05),特质CM与每日负情感(b = 0.18,p <0.01)和特质的认真程度与日常任务完成(b = 0.01,p <0.01)。结论:我们的研究结果重复并扩展了Cooper等人(1995)的发现,即每天在CM和EM饮酒中感觉寻求和负面影响的差异作用,并质疑认为饮酒动机应仅概念化作为个体差异变量。研究结果的理论和应用意义进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号