Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.

Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B

首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.

【24h】

Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.

机译：冲击波碎石术与柔性输尿管镜：钇铝石榴石激光碎石术治疗下极肾结石的成本效益和效率。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Stone management economics is a complex issue. FURS and SWL are recognised treatment option for lower pole kidney stones. There are paucity of data comparing cost implication and effectiveness of both treatment options. Both treatment modalities are equally efficacious. FURS incurred greater cost burden compared to SWL in the UK setting. In the present economic circumstance, clinicians should also consider cost-impact, patient's preference and specific clinical indication when counselling patients for treatment. OBJECTIVE: * To compare the cost-effectiveness and outcome efficiency of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) vs intracorporeal flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (FURS) for lower pole renal calculi

机译：关于这个主题有什么了解？该研究增加了什么？石材管理经济学是一个复杂的问题。 FURS和SWL是公认的下极肾结石治疗选择。缺乏数据比较两种治疗方案的成本影响和有效性。两种治疗方式均有效。与英国的SWL相比，FURS承担了更大的成本负担。在目前的经济形势下，临床医生在建议患者接受治疗时，还应考虑费用影响，患者的偏爱和具体的临床指征。目的：*比较体外冲击波碎石术（SWL）与体内柔性输尿管镜激光碎石术（FURS）治疗下极肾结石

著录项

来源
《BJU international》 |2011年第11期|共4页
作者
Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类泌尿科学（泌尿生殖系疾病）;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi. [J] . Koo V, Young M, Thompson T, BJU international . 2011,第11期

机译：冲击波碎石术与柔性输尿管镜：钇铝石榴石激光碎石术治疗下极肾结石的成本效益和效率。
2. Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy [J] . ConeE.B., EisnerB.H., UrsinyM., Journal of endourology . 2014,第6期

机译：输尿管镜激光碎石术与冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的成本-效果比较
3. Comparison of Stone Dusting Efficiency When Using Different Energy Settings of Holmium: YAG Laser for Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in The Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Calculi [J] . Current Organic Synthesis . 2020,第3期

机译：利用钬的不同能量设置时石尘效率的比较：YAG激光器在尿路结石治疗中的柔性输尿管镜岩石术
4. Transurethral Flexible Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Treatment of Kidney and Upper Ureteral Calculi [C] . Fan-Ping MENG, An-Na WANG, Ji GAO International Conference on Biological Sciences and Technology . 2016

机译：Transurethral柔性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗肾脏和上输尿管结石
5. Preclinical assessment of the multi-YAG laser for intracorporeal lithotripsy of human urinary calculi. [D] . Wollin, Timothy Armin. 1996

机译：多YAG激光对人尿结石的体内碎石术的临床前评估。
6. Two-shift operation mode can improve the efficiency and comfort of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of renal calculi larger than 1.5cm [O] . Sun Hui, Yang Qingya, Yin Xinbao, 2019

机译：双换档操作模式可以提高柔性输尿管钬激光碎石术的效率和舒适性用于治疗大于1.5cm的肾结石
7. Two-shift operation mode can improve the efficiency and comfort of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of renal calculi larger than 1.5cm [O] . Sun Hui, Yang Qingya, Yin Xinbao, 2019

机译：双换档操作模式可以提高柔性输尿管钬激光碎石术的效率和舒适性，用于治疗大于1.5cm的肾结石

Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅