• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Research in autism spectrum disorders >Moral reasoning about everyday situations in adults with autism spectrum disorder
【24h】

Moral reasoning about everyday situations in adults with autism spectrum disorder

机译：自闭症谱系障碍成人日常情况的道德推理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Little work has explored moral reasoning in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The present research used two novel scenario-based tasks to investigate how adults with and without ASD reason about moral rules and apply them in everyday interactions. The Rule Transgressions task examined decision-making in situations where breaking a rule might lead to a personal advantage. People with ASD did not differ from control participants in how frequently they chose to carry out the transgressions or their ratings of acceptability. However, they gave fewer sophisticated rationales to explain why the transgressions were wrong. The Social Intentionality task examined how participants judged and reacted to intentional and accidental transgressions performed by a story character. Both groups judged and responded more harshly to intentional transgressions than unintentional ones, but participants with ASD gave harsher responses overall. The findings suggest some preservation of the understanding of moral rules in ASD, but difficulties in applying and reasoning about these.
机译：小型工作探索了具有自闭症谱系（ASD）的成年人的道德推理。目前的研究使用了两种新颖的基于方案的任务来调查成年人以及没有ASD理由的道德规则的原因，并在日常互动中应用它们。规则违规任务在违反规则可能导致个人优势的情况下审查了决策。有ASD的人没有与控制参与者不同的不同，他们选择进行违法行为或可接受性评级。然而，他们给出了更加复杂的理由，以解释为什么违法是错误的。社会意向任务审查了参与者如何判断和反应故事的故意和意外违法行为。这两个团体都判断并更加严厉地反应故意过于无意的侵犯，但随着ASD的参与者总体而言。调查结果表明一些保护亚委员会道德规则的理解，但在申请和推理这些方面的困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号