...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Trends in food insecurity among California residents from 2001 to 2011: Inequities at the intersection of immigration status and ethnicity
【24h】

Trends in food insecurity among California residents from 2001 to 2011: Inequities at the intersection of immigration status and ethnicity

机译：2001年至2011年加州居民粮食不安全趋势：移民身份与种族交叉口的不公平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract Although immigrants are healthier than non-immigrants on numerous outcomes, the reverse appears to be true with regards to food insecurity. Most studies ignore heterogeneity in the risk for food insecurity within immigration status and by ethnicity, even though significant variation likely exists. We consider how immigration status and ethnicity are related to trends in food insecurity among Latinos and Asians in California from 2001 through 2011. Data come from the 2001 to 2011 restricted California Health Interview Survey (n=245,679). We categorized Latinos and Asians as US-born, naturalized/legal permanent residents (naturalized/LPR), and non-LPRs (students, temporary workers, refugees, and undocumented persons). Multivariable weighted logistic regression analyses assessed temporal trends over the 10-year period after adjustment for demographics, socioeconomic characteristics, and program participation. Across this period, US-born Asians reported similar levels of food insecurity as US-born Whites. Conversely, Latinos, regardless of immigration status or nativity, and Asian immigrants (i.e., naturalized/LPR and non-LPR) reported greater food insecurity than US-born Whites. Further, from 2001 through 2009, non-LPR Latinos reported higher risk of food insecurity than naturalized/LPR Latinos. Thus, food insecurity differs between ethnic groups, but also differs within ethnic group by immigration status. Efforts to reduce food insecurity should consider the additional barriers to access that are faced by immigrants, particularly those without legal permanent residency. Highlights ? We assessed food insecurity by immigrant status and ethnicity from 2001 to 2011. ? Immigrants were more food insecure than non-immigrants. ? Non-LPR Latinos had higher rates of food insecurity than naturalized/LPR Latinos. ? Non-LPR Asians did not differ from naturalized/LPR Asians. ? US-born Asians reported similar levels of food insecurity as US-born Whites.
机译：摘要虽然移民比非移民在许多结果上更健康，但对粮食不安全的逆转似乎是真实的。大多数研究忽视了移民身份和种族内粮食不安全风险的异质性，尽管可能存在显着的变化。我们考虑到从2001年至2011年加利福尼亚州拉丁美洲和亚洲人粮食不安全的趋势如何与加利福尼亚州的粮食不安全趋势有关。数据来自2001年至2011年限制加州卫生面试调查（n = 245,679）。我们将拉丁美洲和亚洲人分类为美国出生，入籍/法律永久居民（归化/ LPR）和非LPRS（学生，临时工，难民和无证人）。多变量加权逻辑回归分析分析在调整人口统计数据，社会经济特征和方案参与后10年期间评估了时间趋势。在这一时期，美国出生的亚洲人报告了与美国出生的白人相似的粮食不安全水平。相反，拉丁美洲，无论移民身份还是诞生，亚洲移民（即，归化/ LPR和非LPR）都报告了比美国出生的白人更大的粮食不安全。此外，从2001年到2009年，非LPR拉丁美洲人报告的粮食不安全风险较高，而不是归化/ LPR拉丁裔。因此，粮食不安全在族裔群体之间不同，但在族裔群体中通过移民身份不同。减少粮食不安全的努力应考虑移民面临的额外障碍，特别是那些没有合法永久居住的障碍。强调 ？我们从2001年到2011年通过移民身份和种族评估了粮食不安全。移民比非移民更加粮食不安全。还非LPR拉丁美洲人的粮食不安全率较高，而不是归化/ LPR LATINOS。还非LPR亚洲人与归化/ LPR亚洲人没有不同。还美国出生的亚洲人报告了与我们出生的白人相似的粮食不安全水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号