...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology of religion and spirituality >The Development, Validation, and Clinical Implications of the Microaggressions Against Religious Individuals Scale (MARIS)
【24h】

The Development, Validation, and Clinical Implications of the Microaggressions Against Religious Individuals Scale (MARIS)

机译：微不足道对宗教个人规模的发展，验证和临床意义（Maris）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We report on the construction of a Microaggressions Against Religious Individuals Scale (MARIS) that measures how religious individuals experience microaggressions-subtle verbal and behavioral acts that may be experienced as demeaning, prejudicial, and/or negating. MARIS items were initially created using prior literature on microaggressions themes and taxonomies, revised using feedback by a panel of experts, and then assessed psychometrically. Religious participants (N = 694; 73.1% female; 52.0% Christians, 12.2% Buddhists, 11.2% Hindu, 9.9% Jews, 9.7% Muslim, and 4.0% other) were recruited for principal axis factoring (Study 1) and confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2). Study 1 (n = 311) yielded a 3-factor model scale (Assumption of Inferiority, Religious Stereotyping, and Assumption of Non-religiosity), and Study 2 (n = 383) found it to have satisfactory fit. The MARIS has high levels of internal consistency, variance, and construct validity. Regression analyses showed that experiences of religious microaggressions uniquely predicted greater depressive symptoms even after controlling for demographics, neuroticism, and overt religious discrimination. Although religious groups did not significantly differ on overt religious discrimination, Buddhists and Muslims reported experiencing significantly more religious microaggressions than Christians. We discuss the clinical utility and applications for the scale against the backdrop of broader debates about microaggressions.
机译：我们报告了对宗教个人规模（Maris）的微不足道的建设，措施宗教个人如何经历微不足道的微妙口头和行为行为，可能经历贬低，偏见和/或否定。 Maris项目最初使用现有文献在微产主题和分类学报上使用现有文献创建，并使用专家面板的反馈进行修订，然后精神度评估。宗教参与者（n = 694; 73.1％的女性; 52.0％基督徒，12.2％的佛教徒，11.2％的印度教，9.9％的犹太人，9.7％穆斯林和4.0％的其他）被招募了主轴因子（研究1）和确认因素分析（研究2）。研究1（n = 311）产生了一个3系数模型规模（假设劣势，宗教刻板印象和非宗教度的假设），并且研究2（n = 383）发现它具有令人满意的合适。 Maris具有高水平的内部一致性，方差和构建有效性。回归分析表明，即使在控制人口统计，神经质和公开的宗教歧视之后，宗教微产的经验也是唯一地预测更大的抑郁症状。虽然宗教团体对公知宗教歧视没有显着差异，但佛教徒和穆斯林报告的宗教微不足道比基督徒更大。我们讨论临床实用性和申请，以防止关于微不足道的更广泛争论的背景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号