...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >DSM-5, ICD-11 and 'pathologization of normal conditions'
【24h】

DSM-5, ICD-11 and 'pathologization of normal conditions'

机译：DSM-5，ICD-11和“正常条件的病理”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The most frequent criticism directed at the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) is that it goes even further than its predecessors in pathologizing conditions which are in the range of normality (Frances, 2013). This criticism actually consists of two components: (a) some of the conditions included in the manual may not qualify as mental disorders, and (b) the threshold for the diagnosis of some conditions which do qualify as mental disorders may be too low in the manual, so that also normal states are included. Is it possible to prevent this criticism in the development of the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision(ICD-11)?
机译：针对精神障碍诊断和统计手册的最常见的批评，第五版（DSM-5）是它比其在常态范围内的病情（Frances，2013）中的传播条件进一步进一步。 这种批评实际上由两个组成部分组成：（a）手册中包含的一些条件可能与精神障碍有资格，（b）诊断某些条件的阈值，该条件有资格作为精神障碍的条件可能太低 手动，因此还包括正常状态。 是否有可能防止这种批评在发展国际疾病分类，第11次修订（ICD-11）？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号