首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of psychiatry : >Cognitive deficits in problematic internet use: meta-analysis of 40 studies
【24h】

Cognitive deficits in problematic internet use: meta-analysis of 40 studies

机译:有问题的互联网使用的认知缺陷:40项研究的Meta分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Excessive use of the internet is increasingly recognised as a global public health concern. Individual studies have reported cognitive impairment in problematic internet use (PIU), but have suffered from various methodological limitations. Confirmation of cognitive deficits in PIU would support the neurobiological plausibility of this disorder. Aims To conduct a rigorous meta-analysis of cognitive performance in PIU from case-control studies; and to assess the impact of study quality, the main type of online behaviour (for example gaming) and other parameters on the findings. Method A systematic literature review was conducted of peer-reviewed case-controlled studies comparing cognition in people with PIU (broadly defined) with that of healthy controls. Findings were extracted and subjected to a meta-analysis where at least four publications existed for a given cognitive domain of interest. Results The meta-analysis comprised 2922 participants across 40 studies. Compared with controls, PIU was associated with significant impairment in inhibitory control (Stroop task Hedge's g = 0.53 (s.e. = 0.19-0.87), stop-signal task g = 0.42 (s.e. = 0.17-0.66), go/no-go task g = 0.51 (s.e. = 0.26-0.75)), decision-making (g = 0.49 (s.e. = 0.28-0.70)) and working memory (g = 0.40 (s.e. = 0.20-0.82)). Whether or not gaming was the predominant type of online behaviour did not significantly moderate the observed cognitive effects; nor did age, gender, geographical area of reporting or the presence of comorbidities. Conclusions PIU is associated with decrements across a range of neuropsychological domains, irrespective of geographical location, supporting its cross-cultural and biological validity. These findings also suggest a common neurobiological vulnerability across PIU behaviours, including gaming, rather than a dissimilar neurocognitive profile for internet gaming disorder. Declaration of interest S.R.C. consults for Cambridge Cognition and Shire. K.I.'s research activities were supported by Health Education East of England Higher Training Special interest sessions. A.E.G.'s research has been funded by Innovational grant (VIDI-scheme) from ZonMW: (91713354). N.A.F. has received research support from Lundbeck, Glaxo-SmithKline, European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP), Servier, Cephalon, Astra Zeneca, Medical Research Council (UK), National Institute for Health Research, Wellcome Foundation, University of Hertfordshire, EU (FP7) and Shire. N.A.F. has received honoraria for lectures at scientific meetings from Abbott, Otsuka, Lundbeck, Servier, Astra Zeneca, Jazz pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, UK College of Mental Health Pharmacists and British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP). N.A.F. has received financial support to attend scientific meetings from RANZCP, Shire, Janssen, Lundbeck, Servier, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cephalon, International College of Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders, International Society for Behavioral Addiction, CINP, IFMAD, ECNP, BAP, the World Health Organization and the Royal College of Psychiatrists. N.A.F. has received financial royalties for publications from Oxford University Press and payment for editorial duties from Taylor and Francis. J.E.G. reports grants from the National Center for Responsible Gaming, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Brainsway, and Roche and others from Oxford Press, Norton, McGraw-Hill and American Psychiatric Publishing outside of the submitted work.
机译:背景,互联网过度使用越来越被认为是全球公共卫生问题。个别研究报告了有问题的互联网使用(PIU)的认知障碍,但遭受了各种方法局限性。确认PIU中的认知缺陷将支持这种疾病的神经生物学合理性。旨在从病例对照研究中对PIU进行严格的认知性能进行严格的荟萃分析;并评估研究质量的影响,主要类型的在线行为(例如游戏)和其他参数在调查结果上。方法进行系统文献综述对同行评审病例对照研究进行了比较与健康对照的患者(广泛定义)的人口认知。提取发现并进行了荟萃分析,其中至少有四个出版物的感兴趣的认知领域存在。结果META分析组成40项研究中的2922名参与者。与对照组相比,PIU与抑制控制中的显着损害相关联(STRoop任务对齐G = 0.53(SE = 0.19-0.87),停止信号任务G = 0.42(SE = 0.17-0.66),GO / NO-GO Task G = 0.51(SE = 0.26-0.75)),决策(G = 0.49(SE = 0.28-0.70))和工作存储器(G = 0.40(SE = 0.20-0.82))。无论是游戏是否是主要类型的在线行为都没有显着缓和观察到的认知效果;也不是年龄,性别,地理区域的报告或分配性的存在。结论PIU与一系列神经心理学域的递减有关,无论地理位置,支持其跨文化和生物有效性。这些发现还提出了跨PIU行为的常见神经生物学脆弱性,包括游戏,而不是用于互联网游戏障碍的不同神经认知曲线。利息宣言S.R.C.咨询剑桥认知和夏尔。 K.I.英格兰东部的健康教育高等培训特别兴趣会议支持的研究活动。 A.E.G.的研究由Zonmw的创新授予(Vidi-Scheme)提供资金:(91713354)。 n.a.f.已收到来自Lundbeck,Glaxo-Smithkline,欧洲神经咽部学院(ECNP),服务器,Cephalon,Astra Zeneca,医学研究委员会(英国),欧盟大学Wellcome Foundation,Wellcome Foundation研究所(FP7)和夏尔。 n.a.f.从雅培,大冢,伦贝克,服务器,阿斯特拉Zeneca,Jazz Pharmaceuticals,Bristol Myers Squibb,英国心理健康药剂师和英国精神职业学院(BAP协会)的科学会议上获得了寄诉人。 n.a.f.已收到财务支持,参加Ranzcp,Shire,Janssen,Lundbeck,Servier,Novartis,Bristol Myers Squibb,Cephalon,International Coldumentive Spectrum疾病,Cinp,IFMAD,ECNP,ECNP,BAP,BAP,世界卫生组织和皇家精神科医生。 n.a.f.已收到来自牛津大学出版物的金融特许权使用费,从泰勒和弗朗西斯获得北京的教育税。 J.E.G.报告来自国家负责任游戏,森林制药,武田,布鲁斯道和罗氏和牛津新闻,诺顿,麦格劳 - 山和美国精神病出版的罗氏和其他人在提交的工作之外的赠款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号