...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of nursing research >Doctor of Nursing Practice in Academia: Lessons from the American Experience
【24h】

Doctor of Nursing Practice in Academia: Lessons from the American Experience

机译：学术界护理实践医生：美国经验的课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It has been 15 years since the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) has been introduced as the entry point for advanced practice nurses in the United States. At the time, it was considered a bold move to ensure that future advanced practice nurses were better prepared to manage the intricacies of a rapidly changing healthcare environment (Zaccagnini & White, 2017). This new degree divided nursing doctoral education into two models that have distinctly different mandates: the DNP and the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). The traditional PhD in Nursing would focus on research and academic scholarship for the generation and testing of nursing knowledge, while the DNP would focus on the informed translation of nursing knowledge into practice (Zaccagnini & White, 2017). Despite the well-articulated primary intent of the DNP designation, its swift and widespread implementation in the United States has sometimes led to confusion of its mandate. As Canadian scholars, we would be remiss if we did not examine the American experience and set in motion safeguards to make sure that the DNP and PhD designations are not confused or perceived as interchangeable.
机译：自从护理医生（DNP）被引入为美国的进入点以来，已有15年了。当时，它被认为是一个大胆的举措，以确保未来的高级练习护士更好地准备管理迅速变化的医疗保健环境的复杂性（Zaccagnini＆White，2017）。这种新的学位将护理博士教育分为两种模式，这些模型具有明显不同的任务：DNP和哲学博士（博士）。护理中的传统博士将侧重于研究和测试护理知识的研究和学术奖学金，而DNP将重点关注护理知识的知识翻译，以实践（Zaccagnini＆White，2017）。尽管DNP指定的良好主要意图，但美国的迅速和广泛实施有时会导致其任务的混乱。作为加拿大学者，如果我们没有审查美国经验并在议案保障中举行议案，我们将是省略的，以确保DNP和PHD名称没有混淆或被视为可互换。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号