• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Harvard international law journal >Conceptualizing the Relationship between International Human Rights Law and Private International Law
【24h】

Conceptualizing the Relationship between International Human Rights Law and Private International Law

机译：概念化国际人权法与私立国际法的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the domestic context, constitutional and private law regimes sit together in an uneasy posture. To reconcile them, domestic regimes tend to articulate some theoretical mechanism of interaction. For example, in the United States, the state action doctrine attempts to mediate the relationship, while in Canada and Germany, the theory of indirect horizontal effect plays an analogous role. This Note explores the possibility of a corresponding tension at the international level. At least in conceit, private international law and international human rights law regimes exist side-by-side. But they lack a clear framework governing their interaction. Drawing from work analyzing the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights ("ECHR") on private international law, this essay identifies and evaluates two potential candidates for a mediating mechanism that could operate beyond the European context: the public policy exception and the concept of horizontal effect. Given the widely-perceived issue of rights underenforcement, a clearer specification of the relationship between international human rights law and private international law might offer broader avenues for rights realization.
机译：在国内背景下，宪法和私法制度在一个不安的姿势中坐在一起。为了调和它们，国内制度倾向于阐明一些理论的互动机制。例如，在美国，国家行动学说试图调解关系，而在加拿大和德国，间接水平效应理论起着类似的作用。本说明探讨了国际层面相应紧张的可能性。至少在自负中，私立国际法和国际人权法律制度并排存在。但他们缺乏一个关于他们的互动的明确框架。从工作中汲取工作分析欧洲人权公约（“ECHR”）对私立国际法的影响，这篇论文确定并评估了两种潜在的候选人，以便在欧洲背景以外经营的调解机制：公共政策例外和概念水平效应。鉴于普遍存在的权利问题不利的问题，更清楚地规范国际人权法和私立国际法之间的关系可能会为权利实现提供更广泛的途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号