• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>AJOB Primary Research >An Attempt to Ground the Expressivist Objection in Actual Practice Flounders
【24h】

An Attempt to Ground the Expressivist Objection in Actual Practice Flounders

机译：在实际实践中犯下表达主义异议的尝试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Klein claims that current practice in the context of fetal selection and screening (FSS) falls well short of acceptable standards in very many instances. He refers to “FSS practices [that] are too often derivative of inaccurate and disparaging models of disability and disability experience . . . and sustained ignorance of disability issues [which is] evident in medical attitudes, practice, education, and research” (Klein 2011, 8). Moreover, the complaint is based upon a considerable degree of empirical evidence that is cited and discussed in the paper. For example, we learn that health care professionals (HCPs) are much more likely than lay people to favor termination of pregnancy when disabling traits are diagnosed in the fetus, and that these negative attitudes insidiously ‘pollute’ the decisions of people in the context of FSS, making them more likely to opt for termination of pregnancy.Worse, disturbing reports of women feeling pressured to opt for amniocentesis are also described. The paper also draws attention to more general problems in the responses ofHCPs to the health problems of people with disabilities, which stem from stereotyping and prejudice.
机译：克莱因声称，目前在胎儿选择和筛查（FSS）方面的实践在许多情况下远远达不到可接受的标准。他指的是“ FSS做法，这些做法往往是残疾和残疾经验的不准确和贬低的模型的衍生。 。 。以及对残疾问题的持续无知（在医学态度，实践，教育和研究中显而易见）（Klein 2011，第8页）。此外，该投诉是基于本文中引用和讨论的相当数量的经验证据。例如，我们了解到，当诊断出胎儿有残疾特征时，医疗保健专业人员（HCP）比外行人士更倾向于终止妊娠，而且这些消极态度会在“人道”背景下“污染”人们的决策。 FSS，使她们更有可能选择终止妊娠。更糟糕的是，令人不安的报告还指出女性感到被迫选择羊膜穿刺术。本文还提请人们注意，在对六氯苯酚对残疾人健康问题的应对中，更普遍的问题是陈规定型观念和偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号