首页> 外文期刊>JAMA facial plastic surgery >Computational Fluid Dynamics to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Inferior Turbinate Reduction Techniques to Improve Nasal Airflow
【24h】

Computational Fluid Dynamics to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Inferior Turbinate Reduction Techniques to Improve Nasal Airflow

机译:计算流体动力学以评估劣质鼻甲减少技术的有效性,以改善鼻气流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Importance ? Inferior turbinate reduction (ITR) is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of nasal obstruction. Which portion of the inferior turbinates should be surgically addressed to improve nasal airflow has yet to be determined. Objective ? To use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis to evaluate the airflow changes after reduction along different portions of the inferior turbinate. Design, Setting, and Participants ? Computed tomographic scans of 5 patients were selected. Seven CFD models were created for each patient: 1 unaltered and 6 various ITRs, including 3 one-third ITRs (anterior, middle, and posterior one-third); 2 two-thirds ITRs (anterior and posterior two-thirds); and 1 full-length ITR model. Total airflow rate and nasal resistance was obtained through CFD analysis, and regression analysis was performed on the increased nasal volume, locations, and nasal resistance for all 5 patients. Main Outcomes and Measures ? Total airflow rate and nasal resistance was obtained through CFD analysis, and regression analysis was performed on the increased nasal volume, locations, and nasal resistance for all 5 patients. Results ? Full ITR over the whole length was consistently most effective to improve nasal airflow and resistance for all 5 patients (2 men and 3 women), adjusted for the volume. Regression analysis showed a strong linear ( R ~(2)≥0.79) relationship between nasal volume changes and nasal airflow. However, the most effective location of partial turbinate reduction was not consistent among patients. Surprisingly, for some patients, posterior ITRs were more effective than anterior ITRs. The site of most effective partial ITR differed from 1 side to the other even in the same individual. Conclusions and Relevance ? The effectiveness of partial ITR and target location likely depends on individual patient anatomy. The fact that full ITRs were consistently most effective and the linear regression between flow and nasal volume changes may indicate that the entire length of the IT has a functional impact on nasal airflow and resistance. Level of Evidence ? NA.
机译:重要性?较差的鼻甲减少(ITR)是治疗鼻梗阻的常用程序。应该通过外前地寻求哪个劣质鼻蛋白的部分以改善鼻孔尚未确定。客观的 ?为了使用计算流体动力学(CFD)分析来评估沿着下鼻甲的不同部分减少后的气流变化。设计,设置和参与者?选择了5名患者的计算机断层扫描。为每位患者创建了七种CFD模型:1个不妨碍和6个各种ITR,其中包括3个三分之一的ITRS(前,中间和后三分之一); 2二三分之二的ITRS(前三分之二);和1个全长ITR模型。通过CFD分析获得总气流率和鼻抗性,对所有5名患者的鼻部量,位置和鼻抗性增加进行回归分析。主要成果和措施?通过CFD分析获得总气流率和鼻抗性,对所有5名患者的鼻部量,位置和鼻抗性增加进行回归分析。结果 ?整个长度的全部ITR始终如一,最有效地改善所有5名患者(2名男子和3名女性)的鼻气流和抗性,调整为体积。回归分析显示出鼻部体积变化和鼻气流之间的强烈线性(R〜(2)≥0.79)。然而,部分鼻甲减少的最有效地点在患者中不一致。令人惊讶的是,对于一些患者,后部ITRS比前ITRS更有效。即使在同一个人中,大多数有效的部分ITR的网站也不同于1侧。结论和相关性?部分ITR和目标位置的有效性可能取决于个体患者解剖学。完整ITRS始终如一的事实,流量和鼻部体积变化之间的线性回归可能表明它的整个长度具有对鼻气流和阻力的功能影响。证据水平? na。

著录项

  • 来源
    《JAMA facial plastic surgery》 |2018年第4期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Otolaryngology–Head &

    Neck Surgery Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond;

    Syracuse Otolaryngology PLLC Syracuse New York;

    Department of Otolaryngology–Head &

    Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus;

    Department of Otolaryngology–Head &

    Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 整形外科学(修复外科学);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号