...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied social psychology >Does shared group identification lead to group creativity? Group regulatory focus as a moderator
【24h】

Does shared group identification lead to group creativity? Group regulatory focus as a moderator

机译：共享组识别是否导致组创造力？ 将监管重点作为主持人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Regarding the effect of identification on creativity in groups, two theoretical views compete. One view emphasizing group-welfare motives underlying identification proposes a positive identification-creativity relationship in groups because members sharing high group identification are motivated to engage in behaviors that they believe are optimal for their group, including those that depart from the group's status quo, thus resulting in enhanced group creativity. The other view highlighting affiliative motives underlying identification, in contrast, posits a negative identification-creativity relationship in groups because highly identified members are motivated to engage in behaviors that certify their belongingness in the group, that is, behaviors that conform to the existing group norms and status quo, which constrains the group's potential for creativity. This study aims to reconcile these competing perspectives by invoking regulatory focus theory. Drawing on the notion that group identification effects rely on the content of group identity that the identification is based on, the authors suggest that group regulatory focus, as a critical group identity content, moderates the identification-creativity relationship in groups; the relationship is positive when the group's regulatory focus is highly promotion-oriented, whereas it is negative when the group's regulatory focus is highly prevention-oriented. Analyzing data from 65 workgroups in a cosmetics company in Korea, the authors show evidence that the identification-creativity relationship is positive in groups with a high promotion focus. The prediction regarding the prevention-focus moderation effect is not supported. The implications of the findings for both theory and practice are discussed.
机译：关于识别对群体创造力的影响，两个理论观点竞争。一个观点强调群体福利动机的潜在身份证明提出了一组积极的识别创造力关系，因为成员共享高级团体识别是有动力的，他们认为他们认为对其集团最佳的行为，包括离开本集团的现状，因此导致群体创造力增强。另一方面，突出了隶属于识别的隶属关系动机，相反，在群体中定位了负面识别创造力关系，因为高度被确定的成员有动力参与证明本集团归属的行为，即符合现有群体规范的行为和现状，限制了该集团的创造力的潜力。本研究旨在通过援引监管焦点理论来调和这些竞争的视角。绘制群体识别效应依赖于识别所基础的分组身份的内容，提交人建议小组监管焦点，作为关键群体身份内容，在群体中调节识别创造力关系;当集团的监管重点是对促进导向的影响时，这种关系是积极的，而当集团的监管重点是高度预防导向时，它是消极的。分析来自韩国化妆品公司的65家工作组的数据，提交人士显示了识别创造力关系，促进焦点高群体。不支持关于预防焦点促进效果的预测。讨论了对理论和实践的调查结果的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Lee Eun-Suk; Park Tae-Youn; Paik Yonjeong;

  • 作者单位

    Korea Adv Inst Sci &

    Technol KAIST Coll Business 85 Hoegi Ro Seoul 02455 South Korea;

    Vanderbilt Univ Owen Grad Sch Management Nashville TN USA;

    Ajou Univ Sch Business Suwon South Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 B849:C91;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号