• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agriculture,Food Systems,and Community Development >Food policy councils and local governments: Creating effective collaboration for food systems change
【24h】

Food policy councils and local governments: Creating effective collaboration for food systems change

机译：食品政策委员会和地方政府：为食品系统创造有效的合作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Drawing data from comparative case studies of 10 California food policy councils (FPCs), this paper describes the nature of the relationships between local governments and FPCs and examines how these relationships support policy-related activities andfood systems change. We focus our comparisons on distinct organizational structures, resourceflows, and policy activities. All but one of the 10 councils is organized as a multisector community collaborative, rather than as an independent nonprofit organization or a government advisory body. Each includes local government personnel as members and most depend on government resources for their operations, including meetingspaces, facilitation, information, and/or direct funding. All 10 councils feature regular meetings at which information is shared to build awareness, relationships, and trust, all of which can indirectly shape policy agendas and initiatives. This policyrelevant work is feasible even for small councils with few resources. FPC leaders can also seize opportunities by considering the stages of the policy process they hope to influence, the types of policy issues they wish to address, the time frame it maytake to realize different types of policy goals, and the degree to which they will seek incremental or more fundamental changes. We find that structural autonomy—being organized outside of the government while maintaining strong collaborations with thegovernment—helps food policy councils retain their independence while promoting more inclusive policy making processes that link community members to the government.
机译：本文介绍了10宗加州食品政策委员会（FPC）的比较案例研究，介绍了地方政府和FPC之间关系的性质，并研究了这些关系如何支持政策相关的活动和食品系统的变化。我们专注于不同的组织结构，资源流出和政策活动的比较。除了10个议会之一之一，作为多层社区的协作，而不是独立的非营利组织或政府咨询机构。每个人都包括当地政府人员作为成员，最依赖于政府资源的运营，包括会议，便利，信息和/或直接资金。所有10个理事会的定期会议，在哪些信息中分享，以建立意识，关系和信任，所有这些都可以间接地塑造政策议程和举措。这种积极形式的工作甚至可行，即使对于少数资源的小委员会而言。 FPC领导人也可以通过考虑他们希望影响的政策进程的阶段，他们希望解决的政策问题的类型，时间范围来实现不同类型的政策目标的时间范围，以及他们将寻求的程度增量或更基本的变化。我们发现，在政府之外组织的结构自主权，同时保持与政府的强大合作 - 帮助食品政策委员会在促进将社区成员联系在政府的流程的同时保留独立性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号