• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational health psychology >A Workplace Incivility Roadmap: Identifying Theoretical Speedbumps and Alternative Routes for Future Research
【24h】

A Workplace Incivility Roadmap: Identifying Theoretical Speedbumps and Alternative Routes for Future Research

机译：一个工作场所的幸存行程：识别未来研究的理论速度和替代路线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Andersson and Pearson's (1999) seminal article on workplace incivility has paved the way for nearly two decades of research focusing on rude and discourteous behavior at work. We now have a better understanding of the dynamics associated with uncivil workplace interactions including the characteristics of those who instigate and are targeted with workplace incivility, the negative consequences of incivility, the mechanisms that link incivility and negative outcomes, and the boundary conditions that affect these relationships. The present article provides a "roadmap" for workplace incivility researchers by identifying five assumptions that we propose are acting as "speedbumps" in current workplace incivility research by limiting advancements about what workplace incivility is and how it functions. We then introduce five "alternative routes" for future workplace incivility research based on these identifications. Our goal is to guide and accelerate research toward a more nuanced understanding of workplace incivility as behavior that occurs within an organizational system.
机译：Andersson和Pearson（1999）关于工作场所幸存下的独创性文章已经为近二十年的研究铺平了近二十年的研究，重点是在工作中的粗鲁和沮丧的行为。我们现在更好地了解与非通透明人工作场所相互作用相关的动态，包括煽动的人的特征，并针对工作场所逍遥法行，幸存不便的负面后果，链接卷发和负面结果的机制，以及影响这些的边界条件关系。本文通过确定我们提出的五个假设，为工作场所屡次采取了一个“路线图”，以通过限制有关工作场所不幸的进步以及如何运作，我们提出的五项假设。然后，我们根据这些标识介绍了未来的工作场所滥用研究的五个“替代路线”。我们的目标是指导和加速对工作场所幸存情比更细致的研究，作为组织系统中发生的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号