...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >Social and Economic Ideologies Differentially Predict Prejudice Across the Political Spectrum, but Social Issues Are Most Divisive
【24h】

Social and Economic Ideologies Differentially Predict Prejudice Across the Political Spectrum, but Social Issues Are Most Divisive

机译：社会和经济意识形态差异地预测了整个政治频谱的偏见，但社会问题最为分裂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Liberals and conservatives both express prejudice toward ideologically dissimilar others (Brandt et al., 2014). Previous work on ideological prejudice did not take advantage of evidence showing that ideology is multidimensional, with social and economic ideologies representing related but separable belief systems. In 5 studies (total N = 4912), we test 3 competing hypotheses of a multidimensional account of ideological prejudice. The dimension-specific symmetry hypothesis predicts that social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice against targets who are perceived to vary on the social and economic political dimensions, respectively. The social primacy hypothesis predicts that such ideological worldview conflict is experienced more strongly along the social than economic dimension. The social-specific asymmetry hypothesis predicts that social conservatives will be more prejudiced than social liberals, with no specific hypotheses for the economic dimension. Using multiple target groups, multiple prejudice measures (e. g., global evaluations, behavior), and multiple social and economic ideology measures (self-placement, issue positions), we found relatively consistent support for the dimension-specific symmetry and social primacy hypotheses, and no support for the social-specific asymmetry hypothesis. These results suggest that worldview conflict and negative intergroup attitudes and behaviors are dimension-specific, but that the social dimension appears to inspire more political conflict than the economic dimension.
机译：自由主义者和保守派对思想不同的其他人表示偏见（Brandt等，2014）。以前关于思想偏见的工作并没有利用证据表明意识形态是多维的证据，具有代表相关但可分离的信仰系统的社会和经济意识形态。在5项研究中（总N = 4912），我们测试了思想偏见的多维叙述的3个竞争假设。维度特异性对称假设预测社会和经济意识形态差异地预测对被认为因社会和经济政治方面而异的目标的偏见。社会最初假设预测，这种思想世界观冲突沿着社会的更强烈经历，而不是经济方面。社会特异性的不对称假设预测，社会保守派比社会自由主义更偏见，没有具体的经济方面的假设。使用多个目标组，多次偏见措施（例如，全球评估，行为）和多种社会和经济意识形态措施（自我置入，问题职位），我们发现对维度特定对称和社会印度假设的相对一致的支持对社会特异性的不对称假设不支持。这些结果表明，世界观的冲突和负面互动态度和行为是特定于维度的，但社会维度似乎比经济方面的政治冲突效力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号