...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric urology >Non-stented versus stented urethroplasty for distal hypospadias repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Non-stented versus stented urethroplasty for distal hypospadias repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:对于远端腹盆维修的无支撑与叉尿道成形术:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Studies have shown that non-stented distal hypospadias repair eliminates stent-related bladder spasm and stent removal discomfort without increasing complications; however, results are inconsistent. We performed a systematic review to assess the complication rates of non-stented compared to the stented distal hypospadias repair.
机译:介绍研究表明,不支撑的远端腹期期修复消除了支架相关的膀胱痉挛和支架去除不适而不会增加并发症; 但是,结果不一致。 我们进行了系统的审查,以评估与额定远端腹部修复相比的非支出的并发症率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号