...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment >The Construct Validity of Distress Intolerance: Is it Distinct from Demoralization and Negative Emotionality?
【24h】

The Construct Validity of Distress Intolerance: Is it Distinct from Demoralization and Negative Emotionality?

机译：窘迫不耐受的构建有效性：它是否不同于不排水化和负面情绪？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Distress intolerance has been studied as a transdiagnostic mechanism implicated in a variety of forms of psychopathology and psychological treatments. Although past research has largely supported the separability of distress intolerance from related constructs, some evidence indicates that it overlaps to a meaningful degree with demoralization and negative emotionality, two affect-laden psychopathology-vulnerability factors. The goal of the current study was to clarify the position of the distress intolerance construct in a nomological network that includes demoralization and negative emotionality. Using a sample of 402 undergraduate students, we performed confirmatory factor analyses to examine the underlying structure of distress intolerance, demoralization, and negative emotionality. We also conducted zero-order correlational and hierarchical regression analyses to examine whether distress intolerance predicts unique variance in theoretically relevant psychological constructs above and beyond demoralization and negative emotionality. Results indicated that, although distress intolerance, demoralization, and negative emotionality demonstrate similar patterns of associations with external criteria, the constructs are structurally distinct and distress intolerance accounts for unique variance in psychological outcomes. Overall, our findings support the construct validity of distress intolerance as empirically separable from both demoralization and negative emotionality. Clinical implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
机译：已经研究了痛苦的不耐受，作为一种以各种形式的精神病理学和心理治疗方法涉及的跨诊断机制。虽然过去的研究在很大程度上支持了相关构建体的痛苦不容忍的可分辨率，但有些证据表明它与具有衰竭和阴性情绪的有意义程度重叠，两种影响升起的精神病理学 - 漏洞因素。目前研究的目的是阐明遇险不容忍构建在包括不道德化和负面情绪的法学网络中的痛苦不容忍构造的位置。使用402名本科生的样本，我们进行了确认因素分析，以检查痛苦不耐受，不耐化和负面情绪的潜在结构。我们还进行了零顺序的相关性和分层回归分析，以检查遇险不耐受是否在理论上相关的心理构建体中的独特方差，以及超出少道化和负面情绪。结果表明，虽然遇险不耐受，不耐受性和负面情绪，但呈现出与外部标准的类似模式，但构建体是结构上不同的，痛苦的不容忍占心理结果的独特方差。总体而言，我们的调查结果支持遇险不容忍的构建有效性，从渗透和消极的情感方面具有明度可分离。讨论了临床意义，限制和未来方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号