首页> 外文期刊>Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. >A Comparison of Long- vs. Short-Term Recall of Substance Use and HIV Risk Behaviors
【24h】

A Comparison of Long- vs. Short-Term Recall of Substance Use and HIV Risk Behaviors

机译:对血液使用和艾滋病毒风险行为的长期召回的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) questionnaire has become a pre-eminent tool in substance use and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk research, allowing researchers to assess fine-grained changes in risk behavior over long periods. However, data on accuracy of recall over long (12-month) periods are sparse, especially combined data on HIV risk and substance use from post-treatment samples. Studies on the development of substance use and HIV risk stand to benefit from data on the accurate recall of such behavior over longer retroactive spans of time. Method: The present study offers data on the test-retest reliability of current TLFB assessment versus 6- and 12-month delayed TLFB assessment, using a post-treatment sample in = 50). Results: Long-term reliability of TLFB data on HIV risk was predominantly good to excellent, with 13 of 20 assessed variables in that range. TLFB data on substance use was similar, with 22 of 26 variables resulting in good/excellent reliability. Conclusions: Our findings support the notion that, notable exceptions aside, the TLFB may be effectively used to assess retroactive HIV risk and substance use in periods of 12 months.
机译:目的:时间表后返回(TLFB)问卷已成为物质使用和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)风险研究的卓越工具,允许研究人员在长期内评估风险行为的细粒度变化。然而,关于长期(12个月)期的召回准确性的数据是稀疏的,特别是关于艾滋病毒风险的组合数据以及从治疗后样品使用的物质。关于物质使用和艾滋病毒风险的发展研究,从数据上受益于更长时间的追溯跨度的准确回忆中的数据。方法:本研究提供了关于当前TLFB评估的测试 - 保持性可靠性与6-10个月延迟TLFB评估的数据,使用后处理= 50)。结果:艾滋病病毒风险的TLFB数据的长期可靠性主要良好至优良,其中13个评估范围内的评分变量。物质使用的TLFB数据类似,26个变量中的22个变量,导致良好/优异的可靠性。结论:我们的调查结果支持概念,除了抛光之外,TLFB可有效地用于评估12个月期间的追溯艾滋病毒风险和物质使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号