...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BioMed research international >A Randomized Comparison Simulating Face to Face Endotracheal Intubation of Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC Video Laryngoscope, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope
【24h】

A Randomized Comparison Simulating Face to Face Endotracheal Intubation of Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC Video Laryngoscope, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope

机译：近达克斯气道范围，C-MAC视频喉镜，Glidescope视频喉镜和Macintosh Laryngoscope的随机比较模拟面对面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives. Early airway management is very important for severely ill patients. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of face to face intubation in four different types of laryngoscopes (Macintosh laryngoscope, Pentax airway scope (AWS), Glidescope video laryngoscope (GVL), and C-MAC video laryngoscope (C-MAC)). Method. Ninety-five nurses and emergency medical technicians were trained to use the AWS, C-MAC, GVL and Macintosh laryngoscope with standard airway trainer manikin and face to face intubation. We compared VCET (vocal cord exposure time), tube pass time, 1st ventilation time, VCET to tube pass time, tube pass time to 1st ventilation time, and POGO (percentage of glottis opening) score. In addition, we compared success rate according to the number of attempts and complications. Result. VCET was similar among all laryngoscopes and POGO score was higher in AWS. AWS and Macintosh blade were faster than GVL and C-MAC in total intubation time. Face to face intubation success rate was lower in GVL than other laryngoscopes. Conclusion. AWS and Macintosh were favorable laryngoscopes in face to face intubation. GVL had disadvantage performing face to face intubation.
机译：目标。早期气道管理对严重病患者来说非常重要。本研究旨在探讨四种不同类型喉镜（Macintosh喉镜，五发术曲线影镜（AWS），Glidescope视频喉镜（GVL）和C-MAC视频喉镜（C-MAC））的疗效。方法。培训了九十五名护士和紧急医疗技术人员，使用AWS，C-MAC，GVL和Macintosh Laryncope与标准的气道教练Manikin和面对面的插管。我们比较了VCET（声带曝光时间），管道时间，第一通风时间，VCET到管道通过时间，管通过时间到第一通风时间，以及Pogo（百分比的百分比开口）得分。此外，我们根据企图和并发症的数量进行比较成功率。结果。 VCET在所有喉镜和Pogo评分中相似，AWS中更高。 AWS和Macintosh刀片在总插管时间的GVL和C-MAC上更快。面对面插管成功率在GVL中比其他喉镜较低。结论。 AWS和Macintosh面对插管是有利的喉镜。 GVL缺点表演面对插管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号