...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of behavioral medicine : >Comparing theories of health behavior using data from longitudinal studies: A comment on gerend and shepherd
【24h】

Comparing theories of health behavior using data from longitudinal studies: A comment on gerend and shepherd

机译：使用来自纵向研究的数据比较健康行为的理论：对格伦德和牧羊犬的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The publication of Gerend and Shepherd's paper [1] on HPV vaccine initiation among young adult women marks a rare event in the health behavior theory literature. Despite the eloquent "call to arms" for comparative theory testing by Noar and Zimmerman [2] and Weinstein and Rothman [3] over 7 years ago, this most recent effort brings the number of longitudinal studies that test health behavior theories against one another to a grand total of just 11. How is it possible that such a worthy project has been so neglected? Comparative testing of whole theories is both conceptually and procedur-ally complex, and many researchers may be loath to subject themselves to the intensive data collection and intricate analyses that Gerend and Shepherd have so admirably performed. We would like to suggest an additional strategy for testing the underlying logic of health behavior theories.
机译：Gerend and Shepherd的关于年轻成年女性开始使用HPV疫苗的论文[1]的发表标志着健康行为理论文献中的罕见事件。尽管7年前Noar和Zimmerman [2]和Weinstein和Rothman [3]雄辩地呼吁进行比较理论测试，但最近的这项努力使纵向研究的数量得以相互验证总共只有11个。这样一个有价值的项目怎么可能被如此忽视？整个理论的比较测试在概念上和程序上都是复杂的，许多研究人员可能不愿接受Gerend和Shepherd如此出色地进行的大量数据收集和复杂分析。我们想提出一种额外的策略来测试健康行为理论的基本逻辑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号