• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >Non-cognitive selected students do not outperform lottery-admitted students in the pre-clinical stage of medical school
【24h】

Non-cognitive selected students do not outperform lottery-admitted students in the pre-clinical stage of medical school

机译：在医学院的临床前阶段，非认知型入选学生的表现不及入学率高

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Medical schools all over the world select applicants using non-cognitive and cognitive criteria. The predictive value of these different types of selection criteria has however never been investigated within the same curriculum while using a control group. We therefore set up a study that enabled us to compare the academic performance of three different admission groups, all composed of school-leaver entry students, and all enrolled in the same Bachelor curriculum: students selected on non-cognitive criteria, students selected on cognitive criteria and students admitted by lottery. First-year GPA and number of course credits (ECTS) at 52 weeks after enrollment of non-cognitive selected students (N = 102), cognitive selected students (N = 92) and lottery-admitted students (N = 356) were analyzed. In addition, chances of dropping out, probability of passing the third-year OSCE, and completing the Bachelor program in 3 years were compared. Although there were no significant differences between the admission groups in first-year GPA, cognitive selected students had obtained significantly more ECTS at 52 weeks and dropped out less often than lottery-admitted students. Probabilities of passing the OSCE and completing the bachelor program in 3 years did not significantly differ between the groups. These findings indicate that the use of only non-cognitive selection criteria is not sufficient to select the best academically performing students, most probably because a minimal cognitive basis is needed to succeed in medical school.
机译：全世界的医学院校都使用非认知和认知标准来选择申请人。但是，在使用对照组的情况下，从未在同一课程中研究过这些不同类型的选择标准的预测价值。因此，我们进行了一项研究，使我们能够比较三个不同的录取组的学习成绩，这三个组均由入学率最低的学生组成，并且都参加了同一学士课程：根据非认知标准选择的学生，根据认知标准选择的学生标准和学生被彩票录取。分析了非认知选择学生（N = 102），认知选择学生（N = 92）和彩票接受学生（N = 356）入学后52周的第一年GPA和课程学分数（ECTS）。此外，还比较了辍学的机会，通过欧安组织三年级的机会以及三年内完成学士学位课程的可能性。尽管第一年GPA的录取组之间没有显着差异，但认知选择的学生在52周时获得的ECTS明显多，并且辍学率比彩票录取的学生少。两组之间通过欧安组织并完成学士学位课程的可能性没有显着差异。这些发现表明，仅使用非认知选择标准不足以选择学习成绩最佳的学生，这很可能是因为在医学院获得成功需要最少的认知基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号